Energy and conservation of momentum confusion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between energy, force, and momentum in the context of a bullet being fired from a gun. It establishes that while both the bullet and the gun experience equal force due to Newton's third law, the distribution of kinetic energy is influenced by their respective masses. The bullet, being significantly lighter, achieves a much higher velocity and thus greater kinetic energy compared to the gun, which has a much larger mass and lower recoil velocity. The conservation of momentum is crucial in understanding this interaction, as it allows for the calculation of the velocities and kinetic energies of both objects post-firing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's third law of motion
  • Familiarity with the conservation of momentum
  • Knowledge of the work-energy theorem
  • Basic principles of kinetic energy calculation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Newton's third law in different physical scenarios
  • Explore the conservation of momentum in elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Investigate the work-energy theorem in various contexts
  • Analyze real-world applications of kinetic energy calculations in ballistics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals in engineering or ballistics who seek to deepen their understanding of momentum, energy distribution, and the principles governing projectile motion.

Jimmy87
Messages
692
Reaction score
19
If you consider a bullet firing from a gun then you have conservation of momentum and a Newton's third law pair (according to what i have read on the internet anyway). They both experience the same force if they are a third law pair but, generally, what is it that determines which object receives more energy? For instance, the bullet has a huge kinetic energy after the gun has fired whereas the gun has very little. So where does energy conservation fit into this example and what is the relationship between energy and force (if there is one)? They are both receiving the same force yet experience different energies?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The relationship between kinetic energy and force is the work energy theorem. It states that ##\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}(x) - \frac{1}{2}mv^{2}(x_0) = \int _{x_0}^{x}F(x')dx'##.
 
Jimmy87 said:
So where does energy conservation fit into this example and what is the relationship between energy and force (if there is one)?
It doesn't.
The kinetic energy is not conserved in this process.
It is like the reverse of a plastic (non-elastic) collision.
The initial KE is zero, the final KE is not.

The distribution of KE is determined by the masses of the two objects.
And maybe the external factors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
WannabeNewton said:
The relationship between kinetic energy and force is the work energy theorem. It states that ##\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}(x) - \frac{1}{2}mv^{2}(x_0) = \int _{x_0}^{x}F(x')dx'##.
This is of no help in this problem!
You are correct to realize that the bullet and the gun are a "Newtons 3rd law pair"
However conservation of energy is not enough to sort out the details, conservation of energy requires consideration of all the energies involved in the interaction.
 
technician said:
This is of no help in this problem!
You are correct to realize that the bullet and the gun are a "Newtons 3rd law pair"
However conservation of energy is not enough to sort out the details, conservation of energy requires consideration of all the energies involved in the interaction.
What are you even talking about? He asked for a relationship between force and kinetic energy. The work energy theorem doesn't require conservation of energy to hold. The determination of the final velocities of the two objects involved in the process only requires conservation of momentum and by itself illuminates why the significantly more massive object doesn't have a recoil velocity comparable to the exit velocity of the smaller mass; he asked for something extra.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Jimmy87 said:
For instance, the bullet has a huge kinetic energy after the gun has fired whereas the gun has very little.
Are you sure about this? It is not obvious.
The bullet has a high speed and the gun has a much smaller recoil speed.
But the mass of the bullet is much smaller than that of the gun.
Their kinetic energies my be quite similar.
 
Jimmy, you are right, an equal force acts on both. Both the bullet and the gun will receive equal momentum (mv), so if you know the masses of each and the velocity after firing of one, you can work out the velocity of the other. You can then calculate the kinetic energy (mv^2)/2 of each. You will find that the kinetic energy of the bullet is greater because of the squared factor.

When the gun fires, chemical energy in the exposive is converted to kinetic energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Jimmy87 said:
If you consider a bullet firing from a gun then you have conservation of momentum and a Newton's third law pair (according to what i have read on the internet anyway). They both experience the same force if they are a third law pair but, generally, what is it that determines which object receives more energy? For instance, the bullet has a huge kinetic energy after the gun has fired whereas the gun has very little.
Yes.

M = gun's mass; V = gun's velocity after shot
m = bullet's mass; v = bullet's velocity after shot

momentum conservation:

MV + mv = 0 → v = -(M/m) V

from here you see that |v| > |V|.

Now let's see kinetic energy T:

Tgun = 1/2 M V2
Tbullet = 1/2 m v2 = 1/2 m (-M/m)2 V2 = 1/2 (M2/m) V2

Tbullet/Tgun = M/m.

So, for example, if m = 20g and M = 5kg, Tbullet is 250 times Tgun.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Wow that's a lot of very useful information, thanks to all!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
879
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K