Energy and momentum + radioactive decay

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving radioactive decay, where a particle of mass M and charge Q disintegrates into three identical particles. Two of the new particles have known speeds, while the speed of the third particle is unknown. The participants are exploring concepts related to charge conservation, momentum conservation, and relativistic effects in the context of energy and momentum calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation laws for charge and momentum in the context of the decay process. There are attempts to relate the charges of the new particles to the original charge Q and to determine the angle A using momentum components. Questions arise about the correct treatment of relativistic effects in momentum calculations and how to approach the energy conservation aspect of the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using conservation principles, while others are exploring the implications of relativistic momentum. There is an ongoing examination of the relationships between the variables involved, particularly regarding the unknown speed of the third particle and the implications for energy conservation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering relativistic effects in the calculations, particularly for momentum. There is also a recognition that the problem requires careful handling of the relationships between the particles' speeds and masses without explicit numerical solutions being provided.

imphat
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let's consider a radioactive decay according to the attached figure. A particle of initial mass M and charge Q is resting according to a referential R and disintegrates itself on 3 identical particles. As shown in the picture, 2 of the particles have known speeds 4c/5 and 3c/5 and the other one has speed unknown.

We want to know:

a) what's the charge q of each of the new particles?
b) what's the value of the angle A?
c) what's the value of M/m, where m is the the mass of one of the new particles?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I can calculate the x and y components for the 3rd particle speed vector and find out what's the value of A, but I'm not pretty sure how to add the charged Q and q into account while handling with energy or momentum conservation.
Same goes for the new charge q. The exercise says that each of these new particles do have the same charge value q, but I don't know how that value is related to Q.
Any help? :D
 

Attachments

  • fig1.gif
    fig1.gif
    2 KB · Views: 501
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

imphat said:
I can calculate the x and y components for the 3rd particle speed vector and find out what's the value of A, but I'm not pretty sure how to add the charged Q and q into account while handling with energy or momentum conservation.
Same goes for the new charge q. The exercise says that each of these new particles do have the same charge value q, but I don't know how that value is related to Q.

Hi imphat! Welcome to PF! :smile:

For q, just use conservation of charge: total charge before = total charge after.

For m, I don't think you bother about charge - the velocities are measured "at infinity".
 
hello, and thanks for your reply

part a
so, since there is a charge conservation and all 3 new particles are identical then the new charge of each particle is q = Q/3. part b
now, about the angle A, since momentum is conserved, and assuming that, after the decay, the particle 1 has momentum p1=m1.v1, can i say that the particle 3 has, in the x-axis, momentum p3x = -p1?

then p3x = m3.v3x and similarly p3y = m3.v3y = (-1).m2.v2, right?

so i got
| m3.v3y | = | m2.v2 |
| m3.v3x | = | m1.v1 |
v3^2 = v3x^2 + v3y^2

where
v1 = 4c/5
v2 = 3c/5
mi = m/sqrt(1-vi^2/c^2)

is that correct? part c
also, i don't get the last question of the problem. It states that each of the new particles has a new resting mass mo = m and asks for M/m. if, from b) i get the v3 value, what do i have to do? I was thinking using energy conservation, so

E = Mc^2 = 3m.c^2 + m1.v1^2 + m2.v2^2 + m3.v3^2

Would that be right?
 
… relativistic momentum …

Hi imphat! :smile:

Part a: Yes.

Part b: That would be fine for ordinary velocities.

But the question obviously wants you to take relativity into account.

(Otherwise v3 would be c√(.6^2 + .8^2), = speed of light, wouldn't it?!)

So your momentum equations must use the relativistic form of momentum.

Try again … :smile:
 
i see, so i used this

- before the decay
px = initial total momentum on x-axis = 0
py = initial total momentum on y-axis = 0- after the decay
px = p1x + p3x

p1x = p1 = m.g1.v1
where
g1 = 1 / √(1 - (v1^2 / c^2) )

p3x = m.g3.v3x
where
g3 = 1 / √(1 - (v3^2 / c^2) )

ie, I'm considering the relativistic mass on the momentum formulas.
then, since the initial momentum was 0, it means that, in module, p1 and p3x are the same

| p1 | = | p3x |

same thing goes for p2 and p3y and after some math i got that

p3y / p3x = 9/16, so

A = arctg 9/16

is that correct?
what about the last part? should i use the energy conservation idea or is there another way?
the problem with using the energy conservation is that, for part B i never had to actually do the math and find out v3. All i have to do is find the ratio v3y/v3x.
 
imphat said:
p3y / p3x = 9/16, so

A = arctg 9/16

is that correct?

Yes! :smile:

No, you don't need any more physics to find the velocity … its just maths from now on … you have momentum in both x and y directions … Pythagoras gives you total momentum … you just need to solve for v3 in momentum = v3/√(1 - v3^2/c^2). :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K