Energy - Cannon Ball and Conservation of Energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the impact speed of a cannonball fired from a 10m-high fortress wall at an angle of 30 degrees with an initial velocity of 80 m/s. The conservation of energy equation, Ugi + KEi = KEf, was applied, leading to a calculated impact speed of 81.22 m/s. Participants noted that the potential energy at 10m is negligible compared to the kinetic energy at 80 m/s, and the initial calculations were confirmed as correct. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding projectile motion and energy conservation principles in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles
  • Knowledge of projectile motion dynamics
  • Familiarity with kinetic and potential energy equations
  • Basic trigonometry for resolving velocity components
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the conservation of energy equation in projectile motion
  • Learn how to resolve vectors into x and y components in projectile motion
  • Explore the effects of height on impact velocity in free-fall scenarios
  • Investigate the relationship between initial velocity and required height for specific impact speeds
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of energy conservation and projectile motion.

mcnealymt
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Energy -- Cannon Ball and Conservation of Energy

Homework Statement


A cannon tilted up at a 30.0 angle fires a cannon ball at 80m/s from atop a 10m -high fortress wall. What is the ball's impact speed on the ground below?

Homework Equations


Conservation of Energy

Ugi+KEi= KEf

*please note that the ground is the zero for potential energy *

The Attempt at a Solution



Ugi+KEi= KEf

mgh+.5mVi^2= .5mVf^2 (m cancels out)

gh+ .5Vo^2= .5V1^2

V1= Square root of {(gh+.5Vo^2)/.5}

81.22m/s

Is this right? I expected the velocity to be much greater since the object was in freefall.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try splitting the velocity into it's x and y components, and then put them into the energy equations
 
You did everything correctly. The contribution of the height is very small, because the potential energy at 10 m is insignificant in comparison with the kinetic energy at 80 m/s. You may want to find out what height a body must fall from to attain 80 m/s, you will see it is much higher than 10 m.
 
I think there is a missing data which is the height of the ball after it was shot (the point where K.E=0), because it stated that the cannon is tilted up 30 degrees and the result should be about projectile motion. The height for P.E should be more than 10m and at the end the result of the final velocity will be bigger when it reaches 0 m.

Note: use the conservation of energy in projectile motion
 
I think there is a missing data which is the height of the ball after it was shot (the point where K.E=0), because it stated that the cannon is tilted up 30 degrees and the result should be about projectile motion. The height for P.E should be more than 10m and at the end the result of the final velocity will be bigger when it reaches 0 m.

Note: use the conservation of energy in projectile motion
 
bs15benny said:
I think there is a missing data which is the height of the ball after it was shot (the point where K.E=0), because it stated that the cannon is tilted up 30 degrees and the result should be about projectile motion. The height for P.E should be more than 10m and at the end the result of the final velocity will be bigger when it reaches 0 m.

You may want to review your understanding of "conservation of energy".

Note: use the conservation of energy in projectile motion

Indeed.
 
Sorry for the late response you guys. First off, I would like to thank each and everyone of you for taking out the time to help me. As it turns out, the answer that I had was correct. Again, sorry for the late response, and thank you for the assistance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
915
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K