Energy conservation: electromagnetic wave in matter

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
An electromagnetic wave passes through a material with conductivity ##\sigma##. The wave is attenuated, and the amplitude exponentially decreases with the distance traveled. Show that the total energy is conserved and what happen with the energy lost by the wave.
Relevant Equations
$$u = u_e + e_m$$
$$\tilde{E} (z,t) = \hat{E}_0 e^{i(\tilde{k}z - \omega t)} \hat{x}$$
$$\tilde{B} (z,t) = \hat{E}_0 \frac{\tilde{k}}{\omega}e^{i(\tilde{k}z - \omega t)} \hat{y}$$
Hi,
I completely failed this homework. I mean I think I know what happen, but I don't know how to show it mathematically. The energy lost by the wave is used to oscillate the electrons inside the conductor. Thus, the electrons acts like some damped driven oscillators.
I guess I have to find ##e_m, u_e##, but I don't know with what to compare. That's pretty all I know.
Any help will me appreciate, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy lost by the wave is used to oscillate the electrons inside the conductor, so we can model the system as a damped driven oscillator. The equation of motion for a damped driven oscillator is given by:$$ \ddot{x} + 2 \beta \dot{x} + \omega_0^2 x = F_0 \cos(\omega t) $$ where $\beta$ is the damping coefficient, $\omega_0$ is the natural frequency of the oscillator and $F_0$ is the amplitude of the driving force. The solution to this equation is given by: $$ x(t) = A_1 e^{-(\beta + i \omega_d)t} + A_2 e^{-(\beta - i \omega_d)t} + \frac{F_0}{m(\omega_0^2 - \omega^2 + i 2 \beta \omega)} \cos(\omega t) $$where $\omega_d = \sqrt{\omega_0^2 - \beta^2}$. The constants $A_1$ and $A_2$ are determined by the initial conditions of the system. By solving this equation you can find the amplitude of oscillation of the electrons in the conductor. The maximum kinetic energy of the electrons is given by $e_m = \frac{1}{2}mv_e^2$, where $v_e$ is the peak velocity of the electrons. Hope this helps.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top