Energy contained in fuel in speed of light ship

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of approaching the speed of light for a spacecraft, particularly regarding energy and mass. It is established that as a ship accelerates towards light speed, its relativistic mass increases, requiring more energy to continue acceleration. The concept of relativistic mass is deemed outdated, and it is clarified that no massive object can reach or exceed the speed of light due to the infinite energy required. The conversation also touches on the limitations of current propulsion technologies and the theoretical frameworks governing relativistic physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with relativistic kinetic energy equations
  • Knowledge of the relativistic velocity addition formula
  • Basic principles of momentum and energy conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of relativistic mass in modern physics
  • Explore advanced propulsion systems, such as photon rockets
  • Learn about the Lorentz transformation and its applications
  • Investigate the concept of energy conservation in closed systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in the theoretical limits of space travel and the physics of high-speed motion.

  • #31
Boing3000 said:
The calculator got me 0.9999999999924827 for 5*10^5 light year. After that , rounding errors seems to kick in.
I'll do one myself using high precision library. I supposed you had some handy.
You're right. I must have messed up the calculation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
A constant 1 g acceleration for decades is beyond any feasibility with the universe as we know it, so that problem is purely theoretical.

A 100% antimatter/matter annihilation rocket with an Isp of 3*107 seconds (5 orders of magnitude higher than chemical rockets, 10 orders of magnitude in terms of energy density) would use about 2/3 of the ship mass as propellant per year to maintain this acceleration (as seen by the ship). Over 30 years, you need 1014 times the ship mass as propellant (likely more as you need multiple stages). A single kilogram as final ship mass would need 1014 kg of antimatter/matter, with an energy content of 1031 J, several billion times the global yearly energy consumption.

There is no known way to get 100% efficiency, however. In particular, some energy will be lost to neutrinos (assuming we have to use baryons). If just 50% of the energy contributes to thrust, we need 8/9 of the ship mass per year. Over 30 years, a single kilogram of ship mass will need 1028 kg of matter/antimatter, or 1045 J. That exceeds the energy released in a typical supernova by an order of magnitude and violates the rule that supernovae are always stronger.

You can scoop up matter on the way and use that as propellant - but that won't work beyond some critical (engineering-dependent) speed as scooping up the particles will slow the ship more than expelling it can accelerate it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mheslep

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 130 ·
5
Replies
130
Views
15K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K