Energy, current and electrical potential of a particle accelerator 🎆

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating energy, current, and electrical potential in the context of a particle accelerator, specifically using the LHC's parameters. The relationship between voltage and energy is established as 1 V = 1 eV, leading to a total energy of 6.5 TeV equating to 119,749.5 J when calculated with the charge of protons. The average current is derived from the number of bunches reaching the collision point per second, with calculations indicating a current of 0.73692 A based on the charge per bunch and the frequency of bunch arrivals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic electrical concepts such as voltage, current, and charge.
  • Familiarity with particle physics terminology, particularly related to particle accelerators.
  • Proficiency in unit conversions, especially between joules, coulombs, and electronvolts.
  • Ability to perform calculations involving energy, work, and charge in a physics context.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of particle acceleration in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
  • Learn about the relationship between energy and charge in particle physics.
  • Explore advanced calculations involving electric fields and potentials in accelerators.
  • Investigate the implications of current measurements in high-energy physics experiments.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, particle physicists, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in the design or operation of particle accelerators will benefit from this discussion.

lpettigrew
Messages
115
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
A particle accelerator accelerates bunches of protons, each containing 115 billion particles, to an energy of 6.5 TeV (1 eV is the energy of one proton or electron that is accelerated by a potential of 1 Volt).
i. What is the electrical potential, in Volts, of each particle?
ii. If the proton charge is 1.6 * 10^(-19) C, what is the energy, in Joules, of each bunch?
iii. If one bunch reaches the collision point every 25 ns, what is the average electric current, in Amps, due to these arriving bunches?
Relevant Equations
W=V*Q
I=Q/t
Hello, I have answered the question below but would like some advice on whether I can improve my answer or if anyone is able to check whether I have made any mistakes ?

i. 1 V = 1eV in a 1:1 relationship, therefore;
6.5 TeV = 6.5 TV = 6.5 *10^12V

ii. E=W
W=V * Q
Q=number of particles * charge on each
Q=(115*10^9)*(1.602*10^-19)=1.8423*10^-8
W=(6.5 *10^12)*(1.84*10^-8)
W=119,749.5 J

iii. Find how many bunches reach the collision point in one second;
1 second = 1000000000 ns
1000000000ns/25ns= 40000000 = 4.0*10^7 bunches per second
The charge on a bunch of protons was earlier shown as 1.8423*10^-8 C.
So Q= ( 4.0 ^ 10^7)*(1.8423*10^-8)=0.73692 C
I=Q/t
I=0.73692/2.5*10^-8 s
I=29476800 A

I think that I have taken a wrong turn on the last question and have confused myself a little confessedly 😳
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lpettigrew said:
taken a wrong turn

Yeah, you used the 25 ns twice :wink: ! Good intuition !
 
Thank you for a reply, how can I correct this? Should it be I=0.73692 A ?
 
Sorry I am confused now
 
lpettigrew said:
I=Q/t
Q=(115*10^9)*(1.602*10^-19)=1.8423*10^-8
and t = 25 ns

Of cousre the peak is enormous, but the exercise specifically asks for the average.
 
Thank you for your reply. Oh so,
I=Q/t
I=1.8423*10^-8/2.5*10^-8 s
I=0.73692 A?

Or I=1.8423*10^-8/25
 
If you want Coulomb/second, the choice is rather obvious !
 
lpettigrew said:
I=0.73692 A?
Right.
lpettigrew said:
i. 1 V = 1eV in a 1:1 relationship, therefore;
6.5 TeV = 6.5 TV = 6.5 *10^12V
That's the answer the book expects, but I would like to note that there is no such potential in the LHC. The acceleration is done by alternating fields, not an absurdly large static potential.
lpettigrew said:
Q=(115*10^9)*(1.602*10^-19)=1.8423*10^-8
W=(6.5 *10^12)*(1.84*10^-8)
You should work with units consistently. That avoids many mistakes.
 
BvU said:
If you want Coulomb/second, the choice is rather obvious !
Thank you for your reply, so in Amps (coulomb/second)=0.73692 A
 
  • #10
mfb said:
Right.That's the answer the book expects, but I would like to note that there is no such potential in the LHC. The acceleration is done by alternating fields, not an absurdly large static potential.
You should work with units consistently. That avoids many mistakes.
Thank you for your reply, do you mean
Q=(115*10^9)*(1.602*10^-19)=1.8423*10^-8 C
W=(6.5 *10^12)V*(1.84*10^-8)C ?
 
  • #11
Add an elementary charge in the calculation of Q (currently there is a dimensionless number in the middle) and it looks good.
 
  • #12
mfb said:
Add an elementary charge in the calculation of Q (currently there is a dimensionless number in the middle) and it looks good.
Sorry, where should I add this (I assume you mean 1.602 x 10^-19)
When calculationing Q, I have already used;
Q=number of particles * charge on each
Q=(115*10^9)*(1.602*10^-19)=1.8423*10^-8
 
  • #13
lpettigrew said:
(115*10^9)*(1.602*10^-19)
That's a multiplication of two real numbers. It doesn't have a unit, so it cannot be a charge.
The elementary charge is 1.602*10^-19 C.
 
  • #14
mfb said:
That's a multiplication of two real numbers. It doesn't have a unit, so it cannot be a charge.
The elementary charge is 1.602*10^-19 C.
So are you saying to multiply 1.8423*10^-8 by 1.602*10^-19 ? Or to find Q using Q=It?
 
  • #15
lpettigrew said:
So are you saying to multiply 1.8423*10^-8 by 1.602*10^-19 ?
No, I'm saying you should use units. Multiply 1.8423*10^-8 by the elementary charge, which is 1.602*10^-19 C. The unit matters.
 
  • #16
So would this be correct ? Q=(115*10^9)*(1.602*10^-19)=1.8423*10^-8 C
(The units being coulombs here)
 
  • #17
That's the same mistake as before. If you write an "=" then both sides should be the same. A number is not a charge.
 
  • #18
mfb said:
That's the same mistake as before. If you write an "=" then both sides should be the same. A number is not a charge.
I agree, I could just not see a reasonable way to find the charge without a given current. However, could I instead use W=V*Q since work done=energy;
Therefore,
W=6.5 *10^12V * 1.602*10^-19 C
W=0.0000010413 J ~ 1.04 * 10^-6 J (3.s.f)
 
  • #19
For how many particles is that ?
[edit]never mind - this isn't about the numbers any more
 
  • #20
I assume that what I had written earlier was wrong, since this was only considering the charge on a single proton, not the 115 billion in the bunch?

So, should I find the charge on the bunch of protons by muliplying the charge on a single prootn (1.602*10^-19) by the number of protons in a bunch (115 billion)
(115*10^9)*(1.602*10^-19)=1.8423*10^-8 (would the units of this be coulombs or could they not be since 115 billion is just a meausre of particles and does not have a unit?)

Then since E=V*Q
E=(6.5 *10^12)*(1.84*10^-8)
E=119,749.5 J

I know that I keep reiterating the same mistakes but I do not know how to correct my answer?
 
  • #21
Hi,

We hammer on these units because they are important: checking the dimension helps find mistakes and wrong formulas.

To the extreme: numbers indeed do not have a dimemsion, but for scale factors you can simply add them (silently):
Energy (per bunch) = Energy (per proton) * (protons /bunch) =
##\qquad\qquad## Charge (per proton) * Potential * (protons /bunch)

So
lpettigrew said:
So, should I find the charge on the bunch of protons by muliplying the charge on a single prootn (1.602*10^-19 C ) by the number of protons in a bunch (115 billion protons/bunch )
(115*10^9 protons/bunch)*(1.602*10^-19 C/proton )=1.8423*10^-8 C/bunch )

(would the units of this be coulombs or could they not be since 115 billion is just a meausre of particles and does not have a unit?)

Then since E=V*Q
E=(6.5 *10^12 V)*(1.84*10^-8 C/bunch ) = 119749.5 J/bunch = 120 kJ/bunch

and the answer ends up as e.g. :
The energy per bunch is 120 kJ​

After a bit of practice (how useful, these exercises !) this all comes naturally :rolleyes: .

Side note: dealing with energy in eV or in J is just a matter of a dimensionless conversion factor
1.602*10-19 Coulomb/e x 1 J/(Coulomb Volt)​
 
  • #22
BvU said:
Hi,

We hammer on these units because they are important: checking the dimension helps find mistakes and wrong formulas.

To the extreme: numbers indeed do not have a dimemsion, but for scale factors you can simply add them (silently):
Energy (per bunch) = Energy (per proton) * (protons /bunch) =
##\qquad\qquad## Charge (per proton) * Potential * (protons /bunch)

SoAfter a bit of practice (how useful, these exercises !) this all comes naturally :rolleyes: .

Side note: dealing with energy in eV or in J is just a matter of a dimensionless conversion factor
1.602*10-19 Coulomb/e x 1 J/(Coulomb Volt)​
Oh, I see what you mean now! Yes, I understand and will make use of these units. Can I ask, are my other answers to parts 1 and 3 correct (or do I have underlying mistkaes also?) Thank you for your help 👍
 
  • #23
lpettigrew said:
Oh, I see what you mean now! Yes, I understand and will make use of these units. Can I ask, are my other answers to parts 1 and 3 correct (or do I have underlying mistakes also?) Thank you for your help 👍
At this point in the thread, I can't tell, at present, what your answers are to parts 1 and 3. Since the issues raised above by @mfb and @BvU emphasize using units consistently and correctly, if you repeat the answers below, please be complete.
 
  • #24
SammyS said:
At this point in the thread, I can't tell, at present, what your answers are to parts 1 and 3. Since the issues raised above by @mfb and @BvU emphasize using units consistently and correctly, if you repeat the answers below, please be complete.
Oh of course sorry, I have attached them below:

1 V = 1eV in a 1:1 relationship, therefore;
6.5 TeV = 6.5 TV = 6.5 *10^12V

ii. E=W
W=V * Q
Energy (per bunch) = Energy (per proton) * (protons /bunch)
Energy (per bunch) = Charge (per proton) * Potential * (protons /bunch)
E=(115*10^9 protons/bunch)*(1.602*10^-19 C/proton )*(6.5 *10^12 V)
W=119,749.5 J ~ 120MJ

iii. Find how many bunches reach the collision point in one second;
1 second = 1000000000 ns
1000000000ns/25ns= 40000000 = 4.0*10^7 bunches per second
The charge on a bunch of protons was earlier shown as 1.8423*10^-8 C.
So Q= ( 4.0 ^ 10^7)*(1.8423*10^-8)=0.73692 C
I=Q/t
I=0.73692/2.5*10^-8 s
I=29476800 A
 
  • #25
lpettigrew said:
iii. Find how many bunches reach the collision point in one second;
1 second = 1000000000 ns
1000000000ns/25ns= 40000000 = 4.0*10^7 bunches per second
The charge on a bunch of protons was earlier shown as 1.8423*10^-8 C.
So Q= ( 4.0 ^ 10^7)*(1.8423*10^-8)=0.73692 C
I=Q/t
I=0.73692/2.5*10^-8 s
I=29476800 A
Parts i and ii look satisfactory.

Part iii has a problem.

Either, consider the amount of charge reaching the collision 'point' in 25 nanoseconds , (1 bunch worth)

OR

consider the amount of charge reaching the collision 'point' in 1 second.

Added in Edit:
And for the line in your post which I bolded :

You should have included the units with the number, 1.8423×10− 8
Q= ( 4.0 ^ 10^7)*(1.8423*10^-8 C)=0.73692 C
 
Last edited:
  • #26
SammyS said:
Parts i and ii look satisfactory.

Part iii has a problem.

Either, consider the amount of charge reaching the collision 'point' in 25 nanoseconds , (1 bunch worth)

OR

consider the amount of charge reaching the collision 'point' in 1 second.

Added in Edit:
And for the line in your post which I bolded :

You should have included the units with the number, 1.8423×10− 8
Q= ( 4.0 ^ 10^7)*(1.8423*10^-8 C)=0.73692 C
Sorry I must have forgotten to include the units again. Would;
Q= ( 4.0 ^ 10^7)*(1.8423*10^-8C)=0.73692 C
I=Q/t
I=0.73692C/2.5*10^-8 s
I=29476800 A

not be the amount of charge reaching the collision point every second?

And would the amount of charge reaching the collision 'point' in 25 nanoseconds being one bunch be;
I=Q/t
I=(1.8423*10^-8C)/25ns
I=7.3692*10^-10 A

(but I do not think that my second suggestion is anywhere near correct, at least not to arrive at the units of amps?)
 
  • #27
lpettigrew said:
Q= ( 4.0 ^ 10^7)*(1.8423*10^-8C)=0.73692 C
You are repeating an earlier mistake that would be easy to spot if you would use units.
4*107 bunches per second. If you multiply a charge by something per second the product is not a charge any more. It's a current. And if you do that correctly you get the correct answer, as e.g. I confirmed in post 8.
I=29476800 A
I=7.3692*10^-10 A
These two are not correct. The second one is missing that 1 ns is 10-9 s.
 
  • #28
mfb said:
You are repeating an earlier mistake that would be easy to spot if you would use units.
4*107 bunches per second. If you multiply a charge by something per second the product is not a charge any more. It's a current. And if you do that correctly you get the correct answer, as e.g. I confirmed in post 8.
These two are not correct. The second one is missing that 1 ns is 10-9 s.

Thank you for your reply.

iii. Oh so would;
I= ( 4.0 ^ 10^7 bunches/second)*(1.8423*10^-8 coulombs)=0.73692 A
So the current passed per seocnd is 7.3692*10^-10 A?

Or to find the charge passed per bunch would I use; Q=energy/voltage
Q=120,000 J /6.5 *10^12 V
Q=1.846154×10^−8 C

Then I=Q/t
If 1 ns = 1*10^-9 s
Then 25 ns = 2.5*10^-10 seconds
I=1.846154×10^−8 C/2.5*10^-10 s
I=73.84616 A per bunch ~ 74 A per bunch

There are 1*10^-9 ns/25ns= = 4.0*10^-11 bunches per second
To find the current per second 74 * 4.0*10^-11 bunches per second = 2.96×10^-9 A per second

Would this be right because the question asks
"If one bunch reaches the collision point every 25 ns, what is the average electric current, in Amps, due to these arriving bunches?"

One ampere is defined as a flow of charge at the rate of 1 coulomb per second, so should the caluclated answer be the bunches per second, not per ns? That is why I multiplied the current per bunch by the number of bunches per second.
 
  • #29
Sorry have I completely muddled my answer up? I think I have confused myself now😳
 
  • #30
lpettigrew said:
I= ( 4.0 ^ 10^7 bunches/second)*(1.8423*10^-8 coulombs)=0.73692 A
Correct. This is your answer here, everything else that follows is a mess that isn't leading anywhere.
So the current passed per seocnd is 7.3692*10^-10 A?
No. As you determined literally one line before, the current is 0.7 A.
lpettigrew said:
Then 25 ns = 2.5*10^-10 seconds
How can 25 times 10-9 be smaller than 10-9?
lpettigrew said:
There are 1*10^-9 ns/25ns= = 4.0*10^-11 bunches per second
ns/ns wouldn't be per second, so that's again having wrong units. If one bunch come every 25 ns, then how can there be less than one bunch per second?
lpettigrew said:
To find the current per second 74 * 4.0*10^-11 bunches per second = 2.96×10^-9 A per second
Ampere per second would be a change of current over time, but the current does not change.

You need to check your answers if they can make sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K