Electric Potential Difference during thunder storm

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the electric potential difference during a thunderstorm, specifically focusing on the charge dynamics between negatively charged clouds and the ground. The original poster presents a scenario where the electric field strength leads to lightning strikes, prompting calculations related to electric potential difference and energy associated with electron movement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between electric potential, charge movement, and energy changes during a lightning strike. Questions arise regarding the direction of electron movement and its implications for energy gain or loss.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, questioning the assumptions about charge flow and energy changes. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of potential energy in relation to the movement of electrons, but no consensus has been reached on the exact mechanisms involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the visualization of charge dynamics, particularly regarding the roles of the negatively charged clouds and the positively charged ground. Participants express uncertainty about the exact nature of electron movement and its implications for energy changes.

EmilyBergendahl
Messages
32
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


During a thunder storm, movement of water molecules within clouds creates friction which causes the bottom of the clouds to become negatively charged. This means that the bottom of the cloud and the ground begin to act like parallel plates. Once the electric field between the clouds and the ground becomes larger than 3.0 x 10^6 N/C, lightning will strike.
a. If the bottom of the cloud is 150 m above the ground, determine the electric potential difference between the ground and the cloud.
b. Say 6.24 x 10^18 electrons move between the ground and the cloud during a lightning strike. How much electric potential energy does this represent? Are the electrons gaining or losing energy?

Homework Equations


E = V/d
q = Ne
V = E_E/q

The Attempt at a Solution


a.
E = V/d
V = Ed
V = (3.0 x 10^6 N/C)(150 m)
V = 4.5 x 10^8 V

b.
q = Ne
q = (6.24 x 10^18)(-1.6 x 10^19)
q = -0.9984 C
q = -1.0 C

V = E_E/q
E_E = Vq
E_E = (4.5 x 10^8 V)(-1.0 C)
E_E = -4.5 x 10^8 J

How can I tell if the electrons are gaining or losing energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Math looks good.

Where are the electrons after the strike? Does this represent a change in the potential energy of the electrons? If so, in which direction?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EmilyBergendahl
Thank you for the response!

I'm not sure if I'm understanding it completely, but if the electrons are moving from the ground (positive plate) to the cloud (negative plate), the electrons would be gaining energy?
 
EmilyBergendahl said:
but if the electrons are moving from the ground (positive plate) to the cloud (negative plate)

EmilyBergendahl said:
which causes the bottom of the clouds to become negatively charged
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EmilyBergendahl
Okay. If the bottom of the clouds are negatively charged, that means that an excess of electrons is present. If more electrons move into the clouds, the electrons in the cloud are gaining energy?
 
I don't think I'm visualizing this properly...
 
EmilyBergendahl said:
Okay. If the bottom of the clouds are negatively charged, that means that an excess of electrons is present. If more electrons move into the clouds, the electrons in the cloud are gaining energy?
Well, I don't know the exact mechanism of lightning phenomenon but from this,
EmilyBergendahl said:
During a thunder storm, movement of water molecules within clouds creates friction which causes the bottom of the clouds to become negatively charged. This means that the bottom of the cloud and the ground begin to act like parallel plates.
I imagine the clouds are negatively charged before the lightning strike. This makes the ground positive w.r.t clouds.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EmilyBergendahl
EmilyBergendahl said:
I don't think I'm visualizing this properly...
If the clouds are negative and ground is positive, how will be the flow of charge?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EmilyBergendahl
In the strike, the electrons will be moving from the cloud to the ground. Therefore, the electrons in the cloud are losing energy?
 
  • #10
EmilyBergendahl said:
In the strike, the electrons will be moving from the cloud to the ground. Therefore, the electrons in the cloud are losing energy?
Yes. When a -ve charge is brought closer to a +ve charge, it loses energy and when it is taken away from the +ve charge, it gains energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EmilyBergendahl
  • #11
Thank you so much again!
 
  • #12
cnh1995 said:
Yes. When a -ve charge is brought closer to a +ve charge, it loses energy and when it is taken away from the +ve charge, it gains energy.
Note that this is about potential energy of the electrons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EmilyBergendahl
  • #13
EmilyBergendahl said:
Thank you for the response!

I'm not sure if I'm understanding it completely, but if the electrons are moving from the ground (positive plate) to the cloud (negative plate), the electrons would be gaining energy?
Yes. Potential energy. As the cloud becomes more and more negatively charged it takes more and more energy to move an electron from the ground to the cloud.

When lightning finally strikes the potential energy is dissipated into light, sound and heat, and who knows what else (e.g. flying debris).

EDIT: the analogy to a capacitor with parallel plates is actually not good. In the capacitor the plates assume a NET charge, in lightning neither the cloud nor the Earth do. The movement of the cloud forces separation of charges so that the bottom of the cloud becomes - and the proximate Earth is induced +. I'm not sure that the electrons actually travel from the cloud to ground as the problem postulates. This is actually a not well understood science even today as I understand it.

.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K