Energy density and pressure of perfect fluid

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the relationship \( p = \frac{\rho}{3} \) for massless particles using the stress-energy tensor and Noether's theorem. It highlights the invariance of the action for a massless scalar field with the Lagrangian \( \mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2} (\partial_{\mu} \phi)(\partial^{\mu} \phi) \) under scaling transformations. The energy-momentum tensor for an ideal gas of massless particles is presented, demonstrating that the trace of the canonical energy-momentum tensor vanishes, confirming the derived relationship.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity and massless scalar fields
  • Familiarity with Noether's theorem and its implications
  • Knowledge of energy-momentum tensors and their derivations
  • Basic concepts of quantum statistics, including Bose and Fermi distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the stress-energy tensor for various fields
  • Explore the implications of Noether's theorem in different physical contexts
  • Investigate the properties of massless particles in quantum field theory
  • Learn about scaling transformations and their effects on physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, general relativity, and theoretical physics, will benefit from this discussion.

RiverL
is there any way to derive p=rho/3 from 4 vector or stress-energy tensor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is true for (free) massless particles only and derives from the invariance of the action under scaling transformations. Take, as an example, a massless scalar field (in for simplicity special relativity). The Lagrangian is
$$\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2} (\partial_{\mu} \phi) (\partial^{\mu} \phi).$$
The action is obviously invariant under the scaling transformation
$$x \rightarrow \lambda x, \quad \phi \rightarrow \frac{1}{\lambda} \phi,$$
because then
$$\mathcal{L} \rightarrow \lambda^{-4} \mathcal{L}, \quad \mathrm{d}^4 x=\lambda^4 \mathrm{d}^4 x.$$
Using Noether's theorem you can show that the corresponding Noether current leads to
$${\Theta^{\mu}}_{\mu}=0,$$
i.e., the vanishing of the (covariant) trace of the canonical energy-momentum tensor.

Another way to directly verify this is to calculate pressure and energy density of an ideal gas of massless particles. The energy-momentum tensor is given by
$$\Theta^{\mu \nu}(x) = g\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \frac{\mathrm{d}^3 \vec{p}}{(2 \pi \hbar)^3} \frac{p^{\mu} p^{\mu}}{p^0} f_{\text{B/F}}(p^0), \quad p^0=\sqrt{m^2+\vec{p}^2}.$$
Here, ##f_{\text{B/F}}## is the Bose or Fermi distribution, and ##g## some degeneracy factor counting intrinsic discrete quantum numbers like spin, isospin, flavor, color and the like.

Since in this integral the particles are always on their mass shell, for ##m=0## you get indeed ##{\Theta^{\mu}}_{\nu}=0## because of ##p_{\mu} p^{\mu}=m^2=0##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K