Trace of the stress energy tensor

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 5K views
dsaun777
Messages
296
Reaction score
39
The stress energy tensor has many forms based on the type of matter you are describing, dust, fluid, perfect fluid... is it true that the trace of all of these matter situations is invariant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dsaun777 said:
The stress energy tensor has many forms based on the type of matter you are describing, dust, fluid, perfect fluid... is it true that the trace of all of these matter situations is invariant?
The trace of any tensor is invariant under coordinate transformations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tertius and vanhees71
dsaun777 said:
is it true that the trace of all of these matter situations is invariant?

As @Nugatory said, the trace of any tensor is invariant under coordinate transformations. However, the traces of the stress-energy tensors describing different kinds of stress-energy will not all be the same. For example, the trace of the stress-energy tensor describing electromagnetic radiation is zero; but the trace of the stress-energy tensor describing dust is nonzero. And the trace of the stress-energy tensor describing a perfect fluid is also nonzero, but different from that of dust.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
PeterDonis said:
And the trace of the stress-energy tensor describing a perfect fluid is also nonzero, but different from that of dust.
Dust is a particular case of a perfect fluid with ##w=0##. A perfect fluid has the trace ##\rho(1+3w)## of the stress-energy tensor, which can a priori take any value unless one starts introducing additional requirements on the equation of state parameter ##w##.
 
Orodruin said:
Dust is a particular case of a perfect fluid with ##w=0##. A perfect fluid has the trace ##\rho(1+3w)## of the stress-energy tensor, which can a priori take any value unless one starts introducing additional requirements on the equation of state parameter ##w##.
And w being pressure/ density?
 
Orodruin said:
Dust is a particular case of a perfect fluid with ##w=0##.

Yes, I should have been clearer, by "perfect fluid" I meant "perfect fluid with nonzero pressure", which would correspond to ##w \neq 0##.