Energy harvesting from hot pipes in home

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for energy harvesting from hot water pipes in residential settings. Participants explore the feasibility of capturing thermal energy released by these pipes, considering both theoretical and practical implications, as well as the effectiveness of insulation versus energy harvesting methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the amount of energy lost from hot water pipes and suggests that cladding could be used to harvest this energy.
  • Another participant argues that insulating the pipes would be more effective than attempting to harvest energy, emphasizing simplicity and cost-effectiveness.
  • Several participants agree that the overall energy loss from water heating is relatively small, particularly in homes with low energy usage.
  • One participant provides specific examples of their energy costs related to water heating, suggesting that the potential for energy recovery may be limited.
  • Another participant mentions that in colder climates, the need to heat the house may negate any benefits from harvesting energy from hot pipes.
  • There is a discussion about regional differences in energy costs and usage, with some participants noting that water heating can represent a significant portion of electricity bills in certain areas, such as New Zealand.
  • One participant suggests additional methods, such as using an "S-bend" to trap convection losses, to enhance energy efficiency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that insulating pipes is a more effective solution than energy harvesting. However, there are competing views regarding the significance of energy loss from water heating and the potential for recovery, with no consensus on the overall feasibility of energy harvesting from hot pipes.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying perspectives based on their regional energy costs and usage patterns, indicating that the effectiveness of energy harvesting may depend on specific circumstances and local conditions.

GBA13
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I was just thinking about something and I'd love to get your opinion. How much energy do you think is lost from water pipes getting hot and releasing that energy into the air? In a three bedroom house there are probably a lot of hot pipes releasing heat energy. Do you think some sort of cladding could be put around them to harvest the energy and do you think there would be a decent power output?

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It would be much more effective to insulate the pipes. Instead of "harvesting" the energy with a complex device, you could prevent the thermal energy from escaping the pipes in the first place. Simple and cheap.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gmax137, Bystander, billy_joule and 1 other person
Agreed. Most houses don't use much energy for water heating anyway and the fraction of that that is loss is small.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
russ_watters said:
Agreed. Most houses don't use much energy for water heating anyway and the fraction of that that is loss is small.
Well that depends on climate. HW is metered separately in many houses in New Zealand, few houses have AC or central heating, I've had bills where half the kWh is HW, 35% was about the average.
 
billy_joule said:
Well that depends on climate. HW is metered separately in many houses in New Zealand, few houses have AC or central heating, I've had bills where half the kWh is HW, 35% was about the average.
Ok, so if the energy usage of a house is really, really low the fraction used for water heating can be high. But that doesn't really change our issue does it? The amount of energy spent on water heating is still low and the energy available to be recovered is still tiny.

To put some numbers to it though, my home is heated by propane, which is probably half the cost of electric for heating, but in any case, that means I get a separate bill for it. In the summer the combined total propane usage between hot water, cooking and clothes drying is $15 a month. A good guestimate is that the water heating is half of that. In the months when I don't need heat or air conditioning, my electric bill is about $40 a month. Converting the propane cost to an equivalent electric cost, that equates to about 20% spent on the water heating. Now, I'm single and male, but still I find it hard to imagine how a house's energy usage can be such a high fraction for hot water.

But still, the bottom line is that the energy cost is only $15 a month if its electricity, which doesn't leave a lot of potential for saving money by recovering some of that energy.
 
Randy Beikmann said:
more effective to insulate the pipes.
... plus, an "S-bend" to "trap" convection losses on vertical plumbing runs, and you've taken care of just about everything.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gmax137
With cold climate, there is nothing to gain as you need to heat the house anyway. Heating water that warms the surrounding air or heating the air directly, same difference.
 
russ_watters said:
Ok, so if the energy usage of a house is really, really low the fraction used for water heating can be high. But that doesn't really change our issue does it? The amount of energy spent on water heating is still low and the energy available to be recovered is still tiny.

To put some numbers to it though, my home is heated by propane, which is probably half the cost of electric for heating, but in any case, that means I get a separate bill for it. In the summer the combined total propane usage between hot water, cooking and clothes drying is $15 a month. A good guestimate is that the water heating is half of that. In the months when I don't need heat or air conditioning, my electric bill is about $40 a month. Converting the propane cost to an equivalent electric cost, that equates to about 20% spent on the water heating. Now, I'm single and male, but still I find it hard to imagine how a house's energy usage can be such a high fraction for hot water.

But still, the bottom line is that the energy cost is only $15 a month if its electricity, which doesn't leave a lot of potential for saving money by recovering some of that energy.

This kind of cost stuff is really very relative to where you live. I agree with Billy, I live in New Zealand too and our water heating costs are a significant portion of our electricity bill. Also unlike the US for example, we don't use diesel for central heating because it is really expensive here, so is propane. Electricity is our cheapest form of energy, apart from domestic solar. Even domestic solar has hidden costs that many people fail to take into account. Pipe lagging is a really good thing to do here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
8K