Undergrad Energy-Momentum Tensor: How Much Do University Students Learn?

Click For Summary
University physics students often encounter a limited scope of the energy-momentum tensor in textbooks, primarily focusing on introductory concepts. The depth of understanding varies significantly based on the professor's approach, with some emphasizing non-relativistic electromagnetism and only briefly touching on covariant formalism. Many students report that their coursework includes more complex problem-solving and discussions that extend beyond textbook material, similar to their experiences in linear algebra. This hands-on problem-solving is crucial for grasping the full implications of the energy-momentum tensor. Overall, the educational experience may provide a deeper understanding than what is typically available in standard textbooks.
kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
There are plentty of textbooks and online papers that talk about the energy momentum tensor, but they all look to me as if they're only covering the very introductory aspects of it. To put another way, it seems that there's much more to be learn.

I would like to know if university physics students are taught a lot more about the energy momentum tensor than one can find in the textbooks? I mean, I would want to know whether they have detailed disscusions about it in a physics course in the uni.

I am myself an undergrad physics student, but we have not even had special relativity classes as of yet.

From my own experience, for example in introductory linear algebra (aka matrices) we are required to know more than what's covered in textbooks, because our exams are very hard, and we won't pass them otherwise. Therefore we end up with a much more deeper knowledge compared to someone who taught himself this only by reading textbooks.

Does the same thing happens regarding the EM tensor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to understand what you mean by more than what's in the textbooks, can you give examples from your linear algebra course of things you learned in lectures that cannot be found in the textbooks?
 
You are given some very difficult problems involving matrices or vector spaces to solve. You need to memorize things such as properties of determinants and operations with matrices.

Textbooks don't treat these very much.
 
These exercises are an integral part of the material to be learnt. It's as important for a physicist to learn both the concepts and then do tons of problems to be able to solve concrete problems.

It depends a bit on the professor who teaches electromagnetism. Many teach it in the conventional non-relativistic way and mention the covariant formalism only at the very end. That's why usually one learns about the energy density, the Poynting vector, and Maxwell stresses without ever being told that all together are just components of the energy-momentum tensor of the em. field. Also usually in em. textbooks is more material than can be covered in a one-semester lecture.
 
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K