Undergrad Energy-Momentum Tensor: How Much Do University Students Learn?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

University physics students often receive a more comprehensive education on the energy-momentum tensor than what is typically found in textbooks. While introductory materials cover basic concepts, advanced discussions and problem-solving exercises are integral to understanding the tensor's applications in electromagnetism and special relativity. The depth of knowledge varies significantly depending on the professor's approach, with some focusing on non-relativistic methods and only briefly addressing covariant formalism. This disparity highlights the importance of practical problem-solving in mastering the energy-momentum tensor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with electromagnetism principles
  • Knowledge of linear algebra, particularly matrices and vector spaces
  • Experience with problem-solving in physics contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced topics in energy-momentum tensor applications in electromagnetism
  • Study the covariant formalism in detail
  • Explore problem sets related to the energy-momentum tensor in university-level physics courses
  • Investigate different teaching methodologies in physics education, focusing on electromagnetism
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate physics students, educators in physics, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of the energy-momentum tensor and its applications in advanced physics courses.

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
There are plentty of textbooks and online papers that talk about the energy momentum tensor, but they all look to me as if they're only covering the very introductory aspects of it. To put another way, it seems that there's much more to be learn.

I would like to know if university physics students are taught a lot more about the energy momentum tensor than one can find in the textbooks? I mean, I would want to know whether they have detailed disscusions about it in a physics course in the uni.

I am myself an undergrad physics student, but we have not even had special relativity classes as of yet.

From my own experience, for example in introductory linear algebra (aka matrices) we are required to know more than what's covered in textbooks, because our exams are very hard, and we won't pass them otherwise. Therefore we end up with a much more deeper knowledge compared to someone who taught himself this only by reading textbooks.

Does the same thing happens regarding the EM tensor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to understand what you mean by more than what's in the textbooks, can you give examples from your linear algebra course of things you learned in lectures that cannot be found in the textbooks?
 
You are given some very difficult problems involving matrices or vector spaces to solve. You need to memorize things such as properties of determinants and operations with matrices.

Textbooks don't treat these very much.
 
These exercises are an integral part of the material to be learnt. It's as important for a physicist to learn both the concepts and then do tons of problems to be able to solve concrete problems.

It depends a bit on the professor who teaches electromagnetism. Many teach it in the conventional non-relativistic way and mention the covariant formalism only at the very end. That's why usually one learns about the energy density, the Poynting vector, and Maxwell stresses without ever being told that all together are just components of the energy-momentum tensor of the em. field. Also usually in em. textbooks is more material than can be covered in a one-semester lecture.
 
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K