Energy of a water tank with compressed air

  • Thread starter Thread starter davidpele
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy change
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the potential energy change in a water tank when air pressure is increased from 1 atm to 2 atm. The potential energy of the water at sea level is calculated as 10 kJ, while the energy required to compress 1 m³ of air to 2 atm is approximately 2,436 J. This additional energy translates to a height increase of about 25 cm for the water, equating to increased potential energy due to the higher pressure. The conversation also highlights the importance of measuring energy output through a turbine to assess the system's overall energy dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (mgh)
  • Knowledge of gas laws, particularly the ideal gas law
  • Familiarity with energy conversion and measurement techniques
  • Basic principles of fluid dynamics and pressure effects
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the ideal gas law and its applications in pressure calculations
  • Learn about energy measurement techniques using turbines
  • Explore the concept of potential energy in fluid systems
  • Investigate the design and schematic setup of energy storage systems like air batteries
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and energy system designers interested in fluid dynamics, energy storage solutions, and the practical applications of pressure in energy generation systems.

davidpele
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Lets fill a 1m x 1m x 2m enclosed water tank with 1m3 of water. Lets place the tank at sea level resulting in the tank having 1 atm of pressure. Now lets pump air into the tank until it is at 2 atm. Has the tanks potential energy changed and by how much?
Relevant Equations
mgh
At sealevel, the water in the tank is just mgh so 1000 kg * g * 1m so about 10 kjoules.
Now if we pump air until it is 2 atm.

The potential energy of a compressed gas is given by the formula:
U = -nRTln(V2/V1)

But in this case it is not the gas that we care about but the water.

I can understand that the tank has higher potential energy because of the higher pressure inside it. But I can't figure out how to calculate how much it has changed by.

I can imagine increasing the air pressure is like lowering it in height. 10m deep in the sea is the equivalent of 2atm.

The other way I can think of this is like the compressed air is raising the height of the tank.
The energy required to compress 1 m³ of air at 1 atm and 25°C to 2 atm is approximately 2,436 J.
So that would mean we've supplied 2436 joules of potential energy to the water.

So the change in height would h = 2436/1000g around 25cm.

Am I thinking about this in reasonable way?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
davidpele said:
Homework Statement: Lets fill a 1m x 1m x 2m enclosed water tank with 1m3 of water. Lets place the tank at sea level resulting in the tank having 1 atm of pressure. Now lets pump air into the tank until it is at 2 atm. Has the tanks potential energy changed and by how much?
Relevant Equations: mgh

At sealevel, the water in the tank is just mgh so 1000 kg * g * 1m so about 10 kjoules.
Now if we pump air until it is 2 atm.

The potential energy of a compressed gas is given by the formula:
U = -nRTln(V2/V1)

But in this case it is not the gas that we care about but the water.

I can understand that the tank has higher potential energy because of the higher pressure inside it. But I can't figure out how to calculate how much it has changed by.

I can imagine increasing the air pressure is like lowering it in height. 10m deep in the sea is the equivalent of 2atm.

The other way I can think of this is like the compressed air is raising the height of the tank.
The energy required to compress 1 m³ of air at 1 atm and 25°C to 2 atm is approximately 2,436 J.
So that would mean we've supplied 2436 joules of potential energy to the water.

So the change in height would h = 2436/1000g around 25cm.

Am I thinking about this in reasonable way?

Thanks.
No. Are you talking about gravitational potential energy or some other kind of potential energy? Can you please provide a schematic of the system you are describing?
 
Chestermiller said:
No. Are you talking about gravitational potential energy or some other kind of potential energy? Can you please provide a schematic of the system you are describing?
Thanks for your reply. I realized I missed one important contextual thing. The way to measure the "energy" present in that system would be to put the water through a turbine and measure the amount of energy generated. I guess that means gravitational potential energy plus the additional energy due to air in the tank being at 2 atm thus exerting additional pressure on the water and increasing the amount of energy it could generate through the turbine.
 
davidpele said:
Thanks for your reply. I realized I missed one important contextual thing. The way to measure the "energy" present in that system would be to put the water through a turbine and measure the amount of energy generated. I guess that means gravitational potential energy plus the additional energy due to air in the tank being at 2 atm thus exerting additional pressure on the water and increasing the amount of energy it could generate through the turbine.
Please show how you would set this up schematically in terms of piping and turbine. Why do you feel you need to put a number on this?
 
I'm sorry, I don't think I understand what you mean by schematically. Could you give an example? The question is interesting to me and hopefully to others. Thanks for the discussion.
 
I found this diagram of an airbattery. This looks like a good example.
 

Attachments

  • download.jpeg
    download.jpeg
    9.1 KB · Views: 106

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
766
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
13
Views
2K