Energy of Li2+ atom according to Bohr's model

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krushnaraj Pandya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom Energy Model
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The energy calculations for the Li2+ atom in the second excited state using Bohr's model reveal that the kinetic energy (KE) is 13.6 eV, while the potential energy (PE) is calculated to be 217.6 eV. The formula used for energy is E = -13.6z2/n2, where z is the atomic number. The potential energy for n=3 was derived using the expression PE = kq1q2/r, confirming the accuracy of the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bohr's model of the atom
  • Familiarity with the concept of kinetic and potential energy
  • Knowledge of Coulomb's law and electrostatic forces
  • Basic grasp of quantum numbers and their significance in atomic structure
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of energy levels in hydrogen-like atoms
  • Learn about the implications of quantum numbers on atomic energy states
  • Explore the application of Coulomb's law in calculating potential energy
  • Investigate the differences between hydrogen and multi-electron atom models
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists studying atomic structures, and educators teaching atomic theory will benefit from this discussion.

Krushnaraj Pandya
Gold Member
Messages
697
Reaction score
73

Homework Statement


If n=1 is taken to be the reference of the potential energy, what will be the kinetic and potential energy in second excited state of Li2+?

Homework Equations


E=-13.6z^2/n^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I know KE is independent of reference point, so from the formula above, KE=13.6 as KE=(-)E for a hydrogen like atom. Now, PE for n=1 is -27.2 eV but we consider it zero here, since it is a mcq question and only one option is positive I know the correct answer is 217.6 eV. This should be calculated by first calculating PE of n=3 with 0 at infinity and then noting the difference but I don't know the expression for PE in terms of Z, I'd appreciate some help-thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just obtained one using kq1q2/r then replacing the values, I'll test whether that gives a correct value or not and return
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K