Energy partitioning (Attenuation)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the attenuation of seismic waves as they reflect off a series of horizontal interfaces, specifically focusing on the energy partitioning at these interfaces and how it affects amplitude when the wave returns to the surface.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of a specific equation for calculating total loss, debating whether it should be applied four or five times based on the number of interfaces the wave interacts with.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing discussion with participants expressing differing views on the number of times the equation should be applied. Some participants seem to reach a mutual understanding of the process involved, while others continue to seek clarification on the interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants question the setup of the problem, particularly regarding the transmission and reflection of the wave at the interfaces, which may influence their calculations and interpretations.

stubbe11
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A seismic wave travel from surface, is reflected at the fifth of a series of horizontal interfaces. Each has a reflection coefficient "R" of 0.15. What is the total attenuation in amplitude caused by energy partitioning at all encountered interfaces, when the wave returns to the surface?

Homework Equations


total loss = (1-R)(1+R) = (1-R^2) [for one layer]

The Attempt at a Solution


We have a discussion here, where some argue that the equation should be used 4 times, hence the answer is 9% of the amplitude has been attenuated. And some who argue that it should be used 5 times (11.25%). Any inputs as what could be the correct one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stubbe11 said:
the equation should be used 4 times, hence the answer is 9% of the amplitude has been attenuated. And some who argue that it should be used 5 times
Up to what point in the whole process? It has to be transmitted through 4, reflected at 1, then transmitted back through the first 4, no? Or have I misunderstood the question?
 
haruspex said:
Up to what point in the whole process? It has to be transmitted through 4, reflected at 1, then transmitted back through the first 4, no? Or have I misunderstood the question?
Thanks for your interest and time.

Well, it seems like you understood it like I did. Transmitted through 4 interfaces and reflected on the 5th, then transmitted back up to the surface through the same 4 interfaces. So would you agree on 4 times then?
 
stubbe11 said:
Thanks for your interest and time.

Well, it seems like you understood it like I did. Transmitted through 4 interfaces and reflected on the 5th, then transmitted back up to the surface through the same 4 interfaces. So would you agree on 4 times then?
Yes.
 
haruspex said:
Yes.
Big thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K