Energy thought experiment (oldschool very)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy storage potential of a trebuchet and its application in powering a motor or light source. Participants explore the relationship between mass, height, and energy output, considering theoretical scenarios and calculations related to gravitational energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a thought experiment involving a trebuchet as a means to store energy and questions how long it could power a 240V motor based on its design and mass.
  • Another participant provides the formula for gravitational potential energy (E = mgh) and notes that not all energy from the counterweight is transferred to the projectile due to kinetic energy at the bottom.
  • A participant calculates the energy output for a 500kg mass falling from 15m to power a 40W light, suggesting it would run for approximately half an hour.
  • There is a mention of the limitations of gravity as a power source, with one participant commenting on the impracticality of using such a system for small applications like desk lamps.
  • Another participant humorously suggests that engineering a skyscraper to harness energy from wind and solar power could serve as a large-scale energy storage solution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants engage in calculations and theoretical discussions, but there is no consensus on the practicality of using gravitational energy storage in everyday applications. The discussion remains open-ended with various viewpoints presented.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about friction and energy transfer efficiency are not fully explored, and the practical implications of the proposed systems are debated without resolution.

toneboy1
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
This might seem a bit weird at first but it raised an interesting question to me about power, work and energy.
I watched this show about how the trebuchet is so much more efficient than previous designs and then I sort of thought of it as a way to store energy and I wondered to myself, if you had one that was geared from the fall to be a speed multiplier connected to a 240V motor (so the long and short arms fell very slowely and the motor spun quite fast) "how long would it run for, 1 min, 1 hr?"
(to be precise I mean like the rate of which it was falling is equal to that necessary to make the motor put out 240V, approximately no more or less)

Then I realized I didn't know how much energy was stored in it. So I'd like to ask anyone, if you had a trebuchet with a mass in it (half a tonne, a tonne, whatever you want) and the height for the short arm to fall was 1m, 10m, 20m, whatever you like, and the lengths of the short and long arm were whatever you specified. How could you know how much energy was stored in it once the mass was raised to full potential (probably a bit over 90degrees) ?

If anyone is interested enough, or knows already could you share?
Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
The energy E stored in the trebuchet is simply...

E = mgh

m=mass of counterweight
g = acceleration due to gravity
h = height the counterweight falls (find using geometry).

Not all of that energy goes into the projectile because the counter weight has KE at the bottom.

The maths for this light is much the same...

http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/green-tech/sustainable/gravity-powered-lamp.htm

although there is a problem using gravity for lighting which I will let you figure out using the following...

Energy = power * time

so

power * time = mgh

Pick a power for your light...say 40W
Pick a run time...say 1 hour or 3600 seconds
Pick a height for your lamp...say 1meter

The required mass is ??
 
Right'o, ok so say we're running 40W (friction etc ignored), then if our mass is 500kg, g = 9.8Nm^2, and the counterweight is 15m high then it will run for half an hour?

500*9.8*15 / 40 = 1837.5 seconds = 30.635

(meaning that there is 73500 N of energy stored in it? (40W*1837s))

Nice article about the lamp btw, though I would have thought it would have made more sense to keep the energy mechanical rather than lighting LEDs with it.
 
toneboy1 said:
Right'o, ok so say we're running 40W (friction etc ignored), then if our mass is 500kg, g = 9.8Nm^2, and the counterweight is 15m high then it will run for half an hour?

Not exactly going to be a small desk lamp then :-)

In short. Gravity is relatively a weak force.
 
CWatters said:
Not exactly going to be a small desk lamp then :-)

In short. Gravity is relatively a weak force.

Well you say that, but if you engineered a skyscraper so that it could be ratcheted up a few inches over the day from wind and solar power you've got yourself a respectable battery. XD
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
980
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K