Hornbein
Gold Member
- 4,120
- 3,284
It's always nice to read about other people's major screwups.
Same principle, maybe, with the paddle ball, though not too dangerous. Get it going really fast, and it gets a little tilted, misses the paddle on the backswing, and bonks you in the head or body. Remember that happening; fun, though.jedishrfu said:Kids would grab the ring and begin moving their hands up and down to make the clackers hit each other, but before long, they started doing it so forcefully enough that the clackers would hit on both the downswing and the upswing.
I have visited Lampson's yard in Pasco, WA. They have a very large crane!Greg Bernhardt said:I remember this local disaster
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Blue_crane_collapse
Negligence! Preventable!Following an investigation by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, it was determined that the crane was outside of the design specifications required for both load and wind. MHIA calculated the effects of side winds on the crane itself. However, it failed to calculate the load. Additionally, the king pin was discovered to not have been installed nor maintained properly. Lack of coordination between contractors was also blamed for the incident.
The point is to learn and not repeat.Hornbein said:It's always nice to read about other people's major screwups.
Huh. I guess the vertical supports weren't long enough and they had to do something. I confess it took me a while to figure out what the problem was, so I would have made the same mistake.DaveE said:I'll vote for the Hyatt Regency walkway collapse in KC, 1981. It killed 114 people and injured 216.
Maybe not the worst disaster, but the simplest to understand once you read about the cause. A deadly misunderstanding of basic physics and unauthorized modifications of the engineering design.
Dunning-Kruger on display, one drawing says it all:
View attachment 367402
They were threaded rods and the contractor didn't want to take the time to thread the nuts up 15 feet of rod. That's why they asked for the change.Hornbein said:Huh. I guess the vertical supports weren't long enough and they had to do something.
Those rods don't seem trivial to make. I would guess you need a fat section in the middle for the thread, or maybe a special clamping sort of nut. I wonder what the original detailed design was. Welded sections?russ_watters said:They were threaded rods and the contractor didn't want to take the time to thread the nuts up 15 feet of rod. That's why they asked for the change.
They are an extremely common construction component, they just aren't usually that long. So common that for smaller assemblies you don't even need a structural engineer, there's books of standards for things like ductwork, piping and small equipment construction/support. This commonality probably contributed to complacency about the construction.DaveE said:Those rods don't seem trivial to make. I would guess you need a fat section in the middle for the thread, or maybe a special clamping sort of nut. I wonder what the original detailed design was. Welded sections?