Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the Aerospace Option in the Engineering Science program at the University of Toronto (UofT). Participants explore concerns about job opportunities, the structure of the program compared to full Aerospace programs at other institutions like Carleton and Ryerson, and the implications of pursuing a mechanical engineering degree before specializing in aerospace.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants question whether a degree from UofT's Engineering Science program will limit job opportunities compared to full Aerospace programs at Carleton or Ryerson.
- Concerns are raised about the lack of job listings for Aerospace engineers requiring less than 5 years of experience, leading to discussions about how to gain relevant experience.
- One participant shares a personal anecdote about a friend who found internships through their engineering program, suggesting that UofT offers placements with notable companies like Bombardier and Pratt and Whitney.
- There is a discussion about the perceived rigor of UofT's program and whether having only 2 years of aerospace exposure is detrimental compared to 4 years at other institutions.
- Some participants assert that UofT's Engineering Science program is highly respected and prepares students well for graduate studies, emphasizing the importance of a graduate degree in aerospace engineering.
- Questions arise about the accreditation status of UofT's program and its implications for future employment.
- Participants discuss the differences between Engineering Science and traditional Engineering programs, with requests for clarification on this distinction.
- There are personal exchanges regarding residence choices and social aspects of living arrangements at UofT.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the value of UofT's Aerospace Option compared to full programs at other universities. While some argue for the strength of UofT's reputation and rigor, others raise concerns about job market readiness and program structure. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best path for prospective aerospace engineers.
Contextual Notes
Participants mention various assumptions about job market requirements, the nature of engineering education, and the importance of internships and co-op placements, but these assumptions are not universally agreed upon. There is also uncertainty regarding the accreditation status of UofT's program.
