How Is the Enthalpy Balance Equation Derived for Chemical Reactions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The enthalpy balance equation for chemical reactions is defined as ΔHReaction0 = ∑ΔHProducts0 - ∑ΔHReactants0. This equation is not derived from the general energy balance equation but is a distinct mathematical tool used to model heat effects in chemical processes. The definition of ΔHReaction0 pertains to changes at constant temperature and pressure (1 atm) and is crucial for determining the heat of reaction using heats of formation. This concept is closely related to Hess' Law, which applies the principle in practical scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics principles, particularly enthalpy.
  • Familiarity with Hess' Law and its applications.
  • Knowledge of chemical reaction mechanisms and heat of formation.
  • Basic grasp of ideal gas behavior and properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Hess' Law in chemical thermodynamics.
  • Explore the concept of heat of formation and its significance in calculating reaction enthalpies.
  • Learn about the general energy balance equation and how it incorporates chemical reactions.
  • Investigate the role of enthalpy in different types of chemical processes, including closed systems.
USEFUL FOR

Chemical engineering students, thermodynamics researchers, and professionals involved in chemical process design and optimization will benefit from this discussion.

MexChemE
Messages
237
Reaction score
54
Hello PF! I have a very short question. We're currently doing enthalpy balances for chemical reactions in our Thermo class. We are using the simple enthalpy balance equation:
\Delta H_{\textrm{Reaction}}^0 = \sum \Delta H_{\textrm{Products}}^0 - \sum \Delta H_{\textrm{Reactants}}^0
My question is, is this equation derived from the general energy balance equation, adjusted in some way for chemical reactions?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
MexChemE said:
Hello PF! I have a very short question. We're currently doing enthalpy balances for chemical reactions in our Thermo class. We are using the simple enthalpy balance equation:
\Delta H_{\textrm{Reaction}}^0 = \sum \Delta H_{\textrm{Products}}^0 - \sum \Delta H_{\textrm{Reactants}}^0
My question is, is this equation derived from the general energy balance equation, adjusted in some way for chemical reactions?
No. ΔH0 refers to the change in enthalpy at constant temperature and 1 atm pressure, starting out with pure reactants at T and 1 atm, and ending up with pure products at T and 1 atm. To measure this, you need to dream up a process in which the reactants and products move between these states, and you measure the amount of heat you have to add so that the final temperature matches the initial temperature. That's the definition of ΔH0. Often, if you have tables of heats of formation that include the reactants and products participating in the particular reaction, you can determine the heat of the reaction from these.

Chet
 
So, it is not a "real" balance in the same vein as an energy or mass balance, just a useful mathematical tool?
 
MexChemE said:
So, it is not a "real" balance in the same vein as an energy or mass balance, just a useful mathematical tool?
I wouldn't put it in those words. It's a well-defined physical quantity that is used to model heat effects in actual processes involving chemical reactions.

Chet
 
Got it. Thanks!
 
MexChemE said:
So, it is not a "real" balance in the same vein as an energy or mass balance, just a useful mathematical tool?
I might also mention that, for a reaction mixture involving ideal gases, since the heat of mixing of ideal gases is zero, delta H zero applies directly to the mixture as well as to starting and ending with the pure products and reactants.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
I wouldn't put it in those words. It's a well-defined physical quantity that is used to model heat effects in actual processes involving chemical reactions.

Chet

Yes, I think I didn't express myself correctly, I know ΔH0 is a well defined quantity. What I meant was that the enthalpy balance equation I wrote in the OP was developed exclusively for chemical reactions, independently of the general energy balance equation, is this right? Sorry, I should have watched my writing.
 
MexChemE said:
Yes, I think I didn't express myself correctly, I know ΔH0 is a well defined quantity. What I meant was that the enthalpy balance equation I wrote in the OP was developed exclusively for chemical reactions, independently of the general energy balance equation, is this right? Sorry, I should have watched my writing.
Sorry, I still don't follow. Are you asking how you include chemical reactions in the general energy balance equation for a piece of equipment? The equation you wrote in the OP is the definition of the quantity known as the heat of reaction, and is not necessarily related to any specific heat balance. However, if you carry out a reaction in a closed system at constant temperature and 1 atm pressure, then the quantity in your OP equation is also the heat you have to add to hold the system at constant temperature. Don't forget that enthalpy is a physical property of each of the materials involved, and is not related to any specific process or piece of equipment.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Are you asking how you include chemical reactions in the general energy balance equation for a piece of equipment?
Yes, this was my original question.
Chestermiller said:
The equation you wrote in the OP is the definition of the quantity known as the heat of reaction, and is not necessarily related to any specific heat balance.
Now it's crystal clear.
Chestermiller said:
Don't forget that enthalpy is a physical property of each of the materials involved, and is not related to any specific process or piece of equipment.
This statement is related to Hess' Law, right?
 
  • #10
MexChemE said:
This statement is related to Hess' Law, right?
Yes. Hess' Law is how it's applied in practice.

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K