Entropy vs Life: Does Nature Use Life to Increase Entropy?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aurorasky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy Life
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between life and entropy in the context of the second law of thermodynamics. Participants argue that while living organisms can decrease their local entropy due to their open system nature, the overall entropy of the universe still increases, primarily due to processes unrelated to life, such as the thermalization of energy from dead stars. Zz emphasizes that the entropy decrease caused by life is negligible compared to natural processes like day/night temperature variations. The conclusion drawn is that life does not significantly contribute to the overall increase in entropy, which is driven by other cosmic phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the second law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with concepts of entropy and open systems
  • Knowledge of thermalization and its implications in thermodynamics
  • Basic grasp of statistical mechanics and its relation to life processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the second law of thermodynamics on biological systems
  • Explore the concept of thermalization in thermodynamics and its effects on entropy
  • Study the role of cosmic background radiation in entropy calculations
  • Investigate statistical mechanics and its application to life and entropy
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, biologists, and anyone interested in the intersection of life sciences and thermodynamics, particularly those exploring the implications of entropy in biological evolution and cosmic processes.

aurorasky
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How do life and all processes linked to life go along with the second law of thermodynamics? If living creatures decrease their entropy because they are open systems and in a state of non-equilibrium with the environment, in general does the total entropy increase? (for example, if we have two exactly equal planets, does life evolution bring about a greater increase in entropy?) Is it correct then to conclude that, in some ways, nature uses life to achieve a higher state of entropy?
 
Science news on Phys.org
I would not conclude that. Entropy increases with our without life. By consuming the plants formed on planets life is not making a very significant contribution. Most of the entropy in our universe is in dead stars.
 
@ZapperZ: thank you for the very informative articles (I really enjoyed reading them). Could you perhaps clarify some points?

1. If I am getting it right, entropy decreases because of day/night temperature differences and this decrease is much greater than the decrease in entropy due to life evolution, by several orders of magnitude. However, the decrease due to the sun is not related to life at all: it would be present even in Dead-Earth. But this decrease in entropy is what can possibly drive evolution and indeed for this reason the overall rate of entropy increase is positive. So my claim was wrong: if life didn't exist, entropy would be higher (I believed that, organizing themselves, living beings brought about greater increase of entropy in the environment. Maybe life is a statistical byproduct, whenever the conditions are permissive?). Did I understand Bunn's argument correctly?

2. Could you explain these passages:

'In this estimate we did not include any entropy increase due to thermalization of the radiant energy emitted by the Earth. If we assume that this radiation eventually thermalizes with the cosmic background (CMB) radiation in deep space, then an additional, much larger entropy increase results' What is thermalization?

'With these assumptions, we can use the standard thermodynamic result mu/T=- partial S/partial N' I don't know how he came up with this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K