Equal sign or approximation sign?

  • Thread starter shuxue
  • Start date
7
0
The authors of a physics textbook want to determine the number of grains, N in a beach of 500 m long, 100 m wide, and 3 m deep. They assumed that each grain is 1-mm-diameter sphere. They also assumed that the grains are so tightly packed that the volume of the space between the grains is negligible compared to the volume of the sand itself. The authors found the answer as follows:

Volume of the beach = N X Volume of each grain
N = (Volume of the beach) / (Volume of each grain)
[tex]N=\frac{(500)(100)(3)}{(\frac{4}{3}\pi)(0.5\times10^{-3})^3}=2.9\times10^{14}\approx3\times10^{14}[/tex]

Why equal sign is used between [tex]\frac{(500)(100)(3)}{(\frac{4}{3}\pi)(0.5\times10^{-3})^3}[/tex] and [tex]2.9\times10^{14}[/tex] instead of approximation sign? Why approximation sign is used between [tex]2.9\times10^{14}[/tex] and [tex]3\times10^{14}[/tex] instead of equal sign?
 

Orodruin

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
15,945
5,917
You are giving too much significance to the particular sign used. The computation in itself is approximative.
 
32,736
4,467
shuxue said:
[tex]N=\frac{(500)(100)(3)}{(\frac{4}{3}\pi)(0.5\times10^{-3})^3}=2.9\times10^{14}\approx3\times10^{14}[/tex]
The first equals sign should really be ≈, IMO, since the 2.9 x 1014 is an approximation. This value, in turn, is approximately equal to 3.0 x 1014.
 
7
0
The example is taken from "Physics: For Scientists and Engineers", by Paul A. Tipler and Gene Mosca.

I found another similar example in another textbook, "Fundamental of physics" by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker. The example is as follows:

A pirate ship is 560 m from a fort defending a harbor entrance. A defense cannon, located at sea level in front of the fort fires balls at initial speed of v = 82 m/s. Thus the maximum range, R of the cannonballs is

[tex]R=\frac{v^2}{g}=((82 \enspace m/s)^2)/(9.8\enspace m \enspace s^{-2})=686 \enspace m\approx690 \enspace m[/tex]

Again, why equal sign is used between ((82 m/s)^2)/(9.8 m s^(-2)) and 686 m instead of approximation sign? Why approximation sign is used between 686 m and 690 m instead of equal sign?
 
32,736
4,467
The example is taken from "Physics: For Scientists and Engineers", by Paul A. Tipler and Gene Mosca.

I found another similar example in another textbook, "Fundamental of physics" by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker. The example is as follows:

A pirate ship is 560 m from a fort defending a harbor entrance. A defense cannon, located at sea level in front of the fort fires balls at initial speed of v = 82 m/s. Thus the maximum range, R of the cannonballs is

[tex]R=\frac{v^2}{g}=((82 \enspace m/s)^2)/(9.8\enspace m \enspace s^{-2})=686 \enspace m\approx690 \enspace m[/tex]

Again, why equal sign is used between ((82 m/s)^2)/(9.8 m s^(-2)) and 686 m instead of approximation sign? Why approximation sign is used between 686 m and 690 m instead of equal sign?
The = isn't appropriate because ##\frac{82^2}{9.8}## is not equal to 686. A better approximation is 686.122.

I would have written the calculation this way:
$$\frac{82^2}{9.8} \doteq 686 \approx 690$$

For your second question, since 686 is not equal to 690 (obviously), it would be incorrect to write 686 = 690.
 
445
5
For your second question, since 686 is not equal to 690 (obviously), it would be incorrect to write 686 = 690.
But then g is not equal to 9.8 ms^-2 either, unless this has been specifically mentioned earlier, even with the restraint of "at sea level"
 
7
0
I want to solve the equation ##2 \sin^2\theta+2 \sin \theta-1=0##, ##0\leq\theta<2\pi##. By using the quadratic formula. I found one of the solution to be ##\theta=\sin^{-1}( \frac{-1+\sqrt{3}}{2})##. Which of the following ways of writing the numerical value of ##\theta## is correct? (i) or (ii)?

(i) ##\theta=0.3747##, (ii) ##\theta\approx 0.3747##

Are both of them acceptable? I noticed that, frequently, in most trigonometric textbooks the numerical solution of a trigonometric equation is written using the equal sign (as in (ii)) even the numerical answer has been rounded. Why equal sign is used instead of approximation sign?
 
32,736
4,467
I want to solve the equation ##2 \sin^2\theta+2 \sin \theta-1=0##, ##0\leq\theta<2\pi##. By using the quadratic formula. I found one of the solution to be ##\theta=\sin^{-1}( \frac{-1+\sqrt{3}}{2})##. Which of the following ways of writing the numerical value of ##\theta## is correct? (i) or (ii)?

(i) ##\theta=0.3747##, (ii) ##\theta\approx 0.3747##

Are both of them acceptable?
Not in my opinion. The first is only an approximation, but using = doesn't indicate that.
shuxue said:
I noticed that, frequently, in most trigonometric textbooks the numerical solution of a trigonometric equation is written using the equal sign (as in (ii)) even the numerical answer has been rounded.
As I recall, most of the trig books I've used (either as a student or as a teacher), the authors took pains to distinguish between exact answers (using = ) and answers that were rounded (using ≈ or ##\doteq##).
shuxue said:
Why equal sign is used instead of approximation sign?
You keep asking this, so apparently you aren't understanding. The = sign should be used for exact answers, and the ≈ should be used if you are writing only an approximate value.
 

Related Threads for: Equal sign or approximation sign?

  • Posted
Replies
14
Views
50K
  • Posted
Replies
15
Views
23K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
13K
Replies
12
Views
14K
Replies
4
Views
27K
Replies
3
Views
5K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top