- #1
MisterX
- 764
- 71
We have that A and B belong to different representations of the same Lie Group. The representations have the same dimension. X and Y are elements of the respective Lie algebra representations.
[itex]A = e^{tX}[/itex]
[itex]B = e^{tY}[/itex]
We want to show, for a specific matrix M
[itex]B^{-1} M B = AM[/itex]
Does it suffice to show this to first order?
[itex]\left(1 -tY + \dots \right)M \left(1 + tY + \dots \right) = \left(1 + tX + \dots \right)M[/itex]
In other words is
[itex]-YM + MY = XM[/itex]
sufficient to show
[itex]B^{-1} M B = AM[/itex]
for all t?
I have seen this used in physics derivations, but it's not clear to me if and why this is sufficient.
[itex]A = e^{tX}[/itex]
[itex]B = e^{tY}[/itex]
We want to show, for a specific matrix M
[itex]B^{-1} M B = AM[/itex]
Does it suffice to show this to first order?
[itex]\left(1 -tY + \dots \right)M \left(1 + tY + \dots \right) = \left(1 + tX + \dots \right)M[/itex]
In other words is
[itex]-YM + MY = XM[/itex]
sufficient to show
[itex]B^{-1} M B = AM[/itex]
for all t?
I have seen this used in physics derivations, but it's not clear to me if and why this is sufficient.
Last edited: