Equation for Relativistic Exhaust Velocity (Ve): Help Needed

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding an equation for the relativistic exhaust velocity (Ve) given energy applied to a mass over a distance. Participants explore the implications of relativistic effects on velocity calculations and the relationship between energy, mass, and distance in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks an equation Ve(joules, mass, distance) that accounts for relativity without relying on conventional velocity calculations.
  • Another suggests using the ratio of total energy to rest energy to derive the relativistic gamma factor and then invert it to find the final velocity.
  • Concerns are raised about the calculations involving rest energy, with a participant questioning the initial math and hinting at the rest energy of one gram of mass in gigajoules.
  • It is proposed that the distance is irrelevant to the final velocity, which only depends on the total energy applied, while distance is relevant for determining acceleration.
  • Participants engage in numerical calculations related to rest energy and gigajoules, with some expressing uncertainty about the magnitude of their results.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between gamma and mass-equivalent-of-energy-added in terms of rest mass, with one participant confirming this interpretation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of distance to final velocity and the correct approach to calculating rest energy. There is no consensus on the final equation or methodology, and several competing ideas are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific calculations and conversions between energy units, but there are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the application of relativistic principles.

BitWiz
Gold Member
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Does anyone have an equation that -- given energy applied to a mass over a distance -- will give me an (ideal) final velocity of the mass?

If I direct a gigajoule to accelerate a gram over a distance of a meter, I obviously get into real trouble with c using conventional equations.

I've found equations that apply Lorentz -- but they seem to do it as an adjustment after a raw, conventional velocity has been obtained, using this final, conventional velocity to plug into Lorentz. That can't work in this case. I'm looking for a function Ve( joules, mass, distance ) that works for all non-negative parameter values, and takes relativity into account. Can you help?

Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BitWiz said:
Does anyone have an equation that -- given energy applied to a mass over a distance -- will give me an (ideal) final velocity of the mass?

Take the ratio of total energy to rest energy: that gives you the relativistic ##\gamma## factor. Then invert the formula for ##\gamma## in terms of ##v## to get ##v##.
 
BitWiz said:
If I direct a gigajoule to accelerate a gram over a distance of a meter, I obviously get into real trouble with c using conventional equations.

You should check your math first. Hint: what is the rest energy of one gram of mass, in gigajoules?
 
BitWiz said:
given energy applied to a mass over a distance

The distance is actually irrelevant to the final velocity. It is only relevant to determining the acceleration required to achieve that velocity. The final velocity only depends on the total energy applied.
 
PeterDonis said:
You should check your math first. Hint: what is the rest energy of one gram of mass, in gigajoules?
c2 / 1000 ?
 
BitWiz said:
c2 / 1000 ?

If you calculate this numerically and convert to gigajoules, yes. What do you get?
 
PeterDonis said:
The distance is actually irrelevant to the final velocity. It is only relevant to determining the acceleration required to achieve that velocity. The final velocity only depends on the total energy applied.
So, v = v' * rest_mass / (Rest_mass + Jo
PeterDonis said:
If you calculate this numerically and convert to gigajoules, yes. What do you get?
~898756 Gj ?
 
BitWiz said:
v = v' * rest_mass / (Rest_mass + Jo

No. Try starting from what I said in post #2.

BitWiz said:
~898756 Gj ?

I think you're too high by an order of magnitude.
 
Whoops.
If a joule = 1 (kg) / c2, then 1kg = c2j, and a gram is 1000th of that?

If c is ~ 3e8, then c2 is 9e16j for a kg. For a gram, 9e13j. For a gigajoule, 9e4?
 
  • #10
PeterDonis said:
No. Try starting from what I said in post #2.

You're saying that gamma is 1 + ( mass-equivalent-of-energy-added / rest mass ) ?

Thanks!
 
  • #11
BitWiz said:
You're saying that gamma is 1 + ( mass-equivalent-of-energy-added / rest mass ) ?

That's one way of putting it, yes. Or you could just do everything in energy units; it works out the same either way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
8K