Equation of circle with arc length

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the equation of a circle given by x² + (y + a)² = R², with x-intercepts at ±√3 and an arc length above the x-axis of 4π/3. Participants suggest that while the equation can be approached using arcsin and numerical methods, a more straightforward solution can be achieved through guess-and-check combined with diagrammatic representation. The consensus is that a rigorous method may not be necessary, as intuitive methods can yield results quickly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of circle equations in Cartesian coordinates
  • Familiarity with arc length calculations in geometry
  • Basic knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically arcsin
  • Experience with numerical approximation methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of arc length formulas in circular geometry
  • Learn about the properties of sine functions and their inverses
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving equations, such as Newton's method
  • Study the application of guess-and-check methods in mathematical problem-solving
USEFUL FOR

Students studying geometry, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in problem-solving techniques for equations involving circles and trigonometric functions.

Grand
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Equation of a circle is:
x^2+(y+a)^2=R^2

x intercepts are +/-\sqrt{3} and arclength above x-axis is \frac{4\pi}{3}

Find a and R.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Grand! Welcome to PF!

(have a square-root: √ and a pi: π and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)

Show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
Hello, I've been tackling the problem for a while and the equation that I managed to come up with is:
\arcsin{\frac{\sqrt{3}}{R}}=\frac{4\pi/3}{2R}

I can't solve it, and haven't found anything else useful.
 
Hello Grand! :smile:

Yes, that looks good …

but it's obviously unsolvable without a computer, sooo :rolleyes:

hadn't you better assume the answer is really obvious, and just make a guess and see if it's right? :biggrin:
 
Well, is it? Even though it is stated in the book, I want to find a way to actually obtain it. Is there a way?
 
hmm :rolleyes: … computer, Newtonian approximation, bribing the TA … :wink:
 
Taylor was my guess too, but here we aim at an exact answer, so we should not use it. Even though, how would you guess the answer?
 
uhhh? :confused:

how many angles do you know with "√3" in the sine ? :smile:
 
Yeah, alright. But come on, there must be some rigorous way doing it - I've been solving it for couple of hrs now, even managed to prove Pythagoras with it.
 
  • #10
What's wrong with guess-and-check? It's a valid method. I don't mean to put you down, but combining this method with drawing a diagram, I was able to get the answer within minutes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K