Equation of motion in curved spacetime

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the equations of motion in curved spacetime, specifically utilizing Killing vectors to derive conserved quantities along geodesics. The conserved quantities are defined as \(Q^t\) and \(Q^k\) for \(k \in \{x,y\}\), derived from a Lagrangian \(L\) that incorporates the metric \(g_{\mu\nu}\). The equations of motion are expressed in terms of the Lagrangian and the Hamiltonian, with emphasis on how the nature of the particle (spacelike, timelike, or lightlike) influences the potential \(V(r)\) and the overall dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Killing vectors in general relativity
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics and Hamiltonian formulation
  • Knowledge of geodesic equations in curved spacetime
  • Basic concepts of spacetime metrics and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of Killing vectors in general relativity
  • Learn about the Hamiltonian formulation of mechanics in curved spacetime
  • Explore the relationship between particle types (spacelike, timelike, lightlike) and their dynamics
  • Investigate the role of conserved quantities in the analysis of geodesics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students in theoretical physics focusing on general relativity, particularly those interested in the dynamics of particles in curved spacetime and the mathematical frameworks used to describe them.

Markus Kahn
Messages
110
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
Consider the spacetime metric given by
$$d s^{2}=-r^{2}\left(1-\frac{1}{r^{3}}\right) d t^{2}+\frac{d r^{2}}{r^{2}\left(1-\frac{1}{r^{3}}\right)}+r^{2}\left(d x^{2}+d y^{2}\right)$$.

1) Identify three quantities which are constant along geodesics, corresponding to the Killing vectors ##\partial_k## for ##k\in\{t,x,y\}##.
2) Show that the geodesic equations can be reduced to an equation of the form
$$\dot r ^2 + V(r)=K^2,$$
for some potential function ##V(r)##. Fix ##K## in terms of the constants of motion from 1).

optional: 3) Sketch the potential ##V(r)## fro timelike and null-geodesics.
Relevant Equations
All given above.
1) We know that for a given Killing vector ##K^\mu## the quantity ##g_{\mu\nu}K^\mu \dot q^\nu## is conserved along the geodesic ##q^k##, ##k\in\{t,r,x,y\}## . Therefore we find, with the three given Killing vectors ##\delta^t_0, \delta^x_0## and ##\delta^y_0## the conserved quantities
$$Q^t := -r^2 (1-r^{-3})\dot q^0,\quad \text{and}\quad Q^k := r^2\dot q^k \quad \text{for}\quad k \in \{x,y\}.$$

2) We first construct a Lagragian
$$L=\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu} \dot q^\mu \dot q^\nu = -\frac{1}{2}r^2\left(1-\frac{1}{r^3}\right)\dot t^2 + \frac{1}{2r^2(1-\frac{1}{r^3})}\dot r^2 +\frac{1}{2}r^2(\dot x^2 +\dot y^2). $$
We then find
$$\frac{\partial L}{\partial q^k} = 0 \quad \text{and}\quad \frac{\partial L }{\partial \dot q^k} = Q^k\quad\text{for}\quad k\in\{t,x,y\}$$
and
$$\frac{\partial L}{\partial r} = -\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{r^2}+2r\right)\dot t^2 - \frac{1}{2}\frac{2r^3+1}{(r^3-1)^2}\dot r^2 + r(\dot x^2 + \dot y^2)\quad \text{and}\quad \frac{\partial L }{\partial \dot r} = \frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{1}{r^3}\dot r\right).$$
Now, since ##Q^k## is conserved in time, three of the four geodesic equations are automatically satisfied:
$$\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q^k}-\frac{\partial L}{\partial q^k} =0 \quad\Longleftrightarrow \quad \frac{d Q^k}{dt}= 0 \quad \text{for}\quad k\in\{t,x,y\}.$$
The only non-trivial eom is the one for ##r##. The issue is, I can't get it into the desired form... What I get is:
$$\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot r}-\frac{\partial L}{\partial r} =0 \quad\Longleftrightarrow \quad \ddot r - \frac{2r^3+1}{2r(r^3-1)}\dot r^2 -\frac{(Q^x)^2 + (Q^y)^2}{r}\left(1-\frac{1}{r^3}\right) -\frac{1}{2}\frac{2 r^3 + 1}{r - r^4}(Q^t)^2 =0$$
I tried to incorporate the different ##Q^k##, but I just don't see how this is supposed to reduce to the desired result...

3) Here I'm just curious how exactly the fact that the particle is spacelike, timelike or lightlike could influence how ##V(r)## looks like.. I mean, where exactly could that information enter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A:For the second part of your question, it may be easier to solve using the Hamiltonian formulation. The canonical momentum conjugate to $r$ is given by\begin{equation}p_r = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{r}} = \frac{1}{2}\left(1 - \frac{1}{r^3}\right) \dot{r}.\end{equation}The Hamiltonian is then given by\begin{equation}H = p_r \dot{r} - L = \frac{1}{4}\left(1 - \frac{1}{r^3}\right)\dot{r}^2 + \frac{1}{2}r^2 \left(\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2\right) - \frac{1}{2}r^2 \left(1 - \frac{1}{r^3}\right)\dot{t}^2.\end{equation}Using $Q^k$ and $H$, you can rewrite the equation of motion as\begin{equation}\ddot{r} = -\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{r^2} + \frac{2}{r}\right)\dot{t}^2 - \frac{1}{2}\frac{2r^3 + 1}{(r^3 - 1)^2}\dot{r}^2 + \frac{1}{r}\left(1 - \frac{1}{r^3}\right)(Q^x)^2 + \frac{1}{r}\left(1 - \frac{1}{r^3}\right)(Q^y)^2 + \frac{1}{2}\frac{2r^3 + 1}{r^3 - 1}(Q^t)^2 - \frac{\partial H}{\partial r}.\end{equation}Now consider the constraint that the particle must be either spacelike, timelike or lightlike. This is equivalent to the constraint that the Hamiltonian must vanish, i.e.\begin{equation}H(q^k,p_k) = 0.\end{equ
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K