Equation of motion of open string with Dirchlet b.c

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the equation of motion for an open string with Dirichlet boundary conditions, as presented in Zwiebach's "A First Course in String Theory." The derived equation is X^{\mu}(\tau,\sigma)=X_{0}^{\mu}-2\alpha' p^{\mu}\sigma +\sum_{n\ne 0}\left(\frac{\sqrt{2\alpha'}}{\sqrt{n}}\sin(n\sigma) a_{n}^{\mu}e^{-in\tau} \right). A key point of confusion is the term 2\alpha' p^{\mu}\sigma, which represents the translational momentum of the string's center of mass, varying with the spatial parameter sigma. This term's behavior indicates that momentum is zero at one endpoint and maximized at the other, raising conceptual questions about the implications of fixed endpoints.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of string theory concepts, particularly boundary conditions.
  • Familiarity with the mathematical formulation of equations of motion in theoretical physics.
  • Knowledge of natural units and their application in physics.
  • Basic grasp of momentum concepts in classical mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equations of motion for strings with Neumann boundary conditions.
  • Explore the implications of boundary conditions in string theory, focusing on Dirichlet conditions.
  • Investigate the role of translational momentum in string dynamics and its physical significance.
  • Review advanced topics in string theory, including the relationship between boundary conditions and string interactions.
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in string theory, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of string dynamics and boundary conditions.

benbenny
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Fashioned after the derivation of the equation of motion for a string with Neumann b.c in Zwiebach's a first course of string theory, I have derived the very similar equation using Dirchlet b.c. My result, in natural units, is
X^{\mu}(\tau,\sigma)=X_{0}^{\mu}-2\alpha' p^{\mu}\sigma +\sum_{n\ne 0}\left(\frac{\sqrt{2\alpha'}}{\sqrt{n}}\sin(n\sigma) a_{n}^{\mu}e^{-in\tau} \right)

Im having a hard time understanding the significance of the term
2\alpha' p^{\mu}\sigma .

From comparing this result to the Neumann b.c derived string, I understand that this term signifies translational momentum of the center of mass of the string in spacetime. Since this string has fixed endpoints, my intuitive guess would be that it would have zero translational momentum. Further I am baffled by the sigma dependence of this term which indicates that this momentum term is zero at one endpoint of the string, and maximized at the other end. I am lost on this, any clarification would be much appreciated.

Thanks.

Ben
 
Physics news on Phys.org
benbenny said:
Fashioned after the derivation of the equation of motion for a string with Neumann b.c in Zwiebach's a first course of string theory, I have derived the very similar equation using Dirchlet b.c. My result, in natural units, is
X^{\mu}(\tau,\sigma)=X_{0}^{\mu}-2\alpha' p^{\mu}\sigma +\sum_{n\ne 0}\left(\frac{\sqrt{2\alpha'}}{\sqrt{n}}\sin(n\sigma) a_{n}^{\mu}e^{-in\tau} \right)

Im having a hard time understanding the significance of the term
2\alpha' p^{\mu}\sigma .

From comparing this result to the Neumann b.c derived string, I understand that this term signifies translational momentum of the center of mass of the string in spacetime. Since this string has fixed endpoints, my intuitive guess would be that it would have zero translational momentum. Further I am baffled by the sigma dependence of this term which indicates that this momentum term is zero at one endpoint of the string, and maximized at the other end. I am lost on this, any clarification would be much appreciated.

Thanks.

Ben

Anyone know why I am getting no answer for this one? Should I post it in the beyond the standard model forum?

Cheers.
 
Maybe ask one of the mentors/moderators to move it... you're probably more likely to get an answer there since this is beyond the level of what usually winds up in the HW forum. (And you're asking more of a conceptual question than "how do I do this problem" anyway :wink:)
 
Yeah, who wants to study all the string nonsense anyway? :p
 
Ok. Just thought that since its undergrad level question...but ill ask a moderator. thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K