Equation that is defined as an identity

  • Thread starter Thread starter RChristenk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    algebra-precalculus
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the equation ##5x-6=5x-6##, which is identified as an identity valid for all values of ##x##. Participants are exploring the implications of simplifying this identity to ##0=0## and questioning whether this leads to any contradictions regarding the variable ##x##.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the nature of identities and the implications of simplifying them. Questions are raised about the validity of the simplification to ##0=0## and whether it leads to contradictions regarding the existence of ##x##.

Discussion Status

Some participants assert that the simplification does not lead to a contradiction, emphasizing that both forms of the equation are true for any value of ##x##. Others are questioning the interpretation of the simplification and its implications.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the definitions and properties of identities in algebra, and participants are examining the assumptions underlying their reasoning about the variable ##x## and the simplification process.

RChristenk
Messages
73
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
##5x-6=5x-6##
Relevant Equations
Algebraic concepts
##5x-6=5x-6## is defined as an identity because it is true for all values of ##x##.

My question is I can further simplify and arrive at ##0=0##, in which case no values of ##x## will work because the variable ##x## itself doesn't exist.

Isn't this a contradiction? Or did I violate some rule when I simplified it to ##0=0##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RChristenk said:
Homework Statement: ##5x-6=5x-6##
Relevant Equations: Algebraic concepts

##5x-6=5x-6## is defined as an identity because it is true for all values of ##x##.

My question is I can further simplify and arrive at ##0=0##, in which case no values of ##x## will work because the variable ##x## itself doesn't exist.

Isn't this a contradiction? Or did I violate some rule when I simplified it to ##0=0##?
No, not a contradiction. The equation ##5x - 6 = 5x - 6## is equivalent to ##0 = 0##. Like the first identity, the second is true for any values of x. For example, if x = 5, the equation 0 = 0 is still a true statement.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RChristenk, AR72 and PeroK
RChristenk said:
no values of ##x## will work
No. It means that any value of ##x## will work. No matter what value you set for ##x##, you always have 0 = 0.
 
For which values of ##x## is ##0=0## not true?
 
RChristenk said:
Homework Statement: ##5x-6=5x-6##
Relevant Equations: Algebraic concepts

##5x-6=5x-6## is defined as an identity because it is true for all values of ##x##.

My question is I can further simplify and arrive at ##0=0##, in which case no values of ##x## will work because the variable ##x## itself doesn't exist.

Isn't this a contradiction? Or did I violate some rule when I simplified it to ##0=0##?
It's also true for ##x=\frac {6}{5} ##
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
10K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K