Equations of motion in a free fall with friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the equations of motion for an object in free fall, specifically considering the effects of friction. Participants are exploring the application of Newton's second law and the integration of motion equations to derive velocity and position over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to integrate Newton's second law to find acceleration and position but expresses confusion over interpreting certain terms in the equations. They question whether they should be solving a differential equation. Other participants confirm that the problem involves solving a first-order linear differential equation and provide insights into rewriting and manipulating the equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the formulation of the problem and the necessary steps to solve the differential equation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the integration process and the interpretation of terms, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes that the presence of friction means the object is not in free fall, which raises questions about the assumptions underlying the problem setup.

torito_verdejo
Messages
20
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
A point mass ##m## is dropped from a hight ##z##. Its motion is subject to gravity force and a friction force ##F_f=-\lambda \dot{z}##.
Write the equations of motion for this system.
Relevant Equations
$$F_f=-\lambda \dot{z}$$
I'm stack at the very beginning. If I use Newton's second law to find acceleration and integrate until I find the position, I must face

$$v(t) = \int_0^t g-\frac{\lambda v}{m} dt'=gt-\frac{\lambda }{m} \int_0^t\frac{\partial z}{\partial t}dt$$

But this last term feels pretty weird. I don't know how to interpret it, even though

$$\frac{\partial z}{\partial t}dt = dz$$

If I extract velocity from friction, we get

$$v(t)=\frac{m}{\lambda}(g-a(t))$$

which once again defines a function by its derivative. Should I be solving a differential equation?

In any case, I face two possible ways and I wonder which one, if any, is the correct one. Thank you in advance for the help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The simple answer is that yes, this is about solving differential equations. Have you studied these?

Your last equation could better be written:

##\ddot{z} = g - \frac{\lambda}{m}\dot{z}##

Note: this is, by definition, the "equation of motion" for the system.

In the first part of your post you effectively integrated this, using the initial conditions, to get:

##\dot{z} = gt - \frac \lambda m z##

Note that your "weird" integral was just the integral of a derivative, which is given by the fundamental theorem of calculus. Note that the derivative should be an ordinary time derivative, not a partial derivative.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: torito_verdejo and Delta2
Yes you are called to solve a first order linear differential equation here. The first step is to gather the unknown function and all its derivatives to the same side of the equation and write the equation as $$\dot v+\frac{\lambda}{m}v=g$$.
Now we notice that if we multiply the equation by the factor ##e^{\frac{\lambda}{m}t}## then the LHS becomes the derivative of the product ##e^{\frac{\lambda}{m}t}v(t)## so we ll have
$$(e^{\frac{\lambda}{m}t}v(t))'=ge^{\frac{\lambda}{m}t}$$
and from this last equation you can integrate both sides and after some algebraic manipulation you can solve for the unknown function ##v(t)##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: torito_verdejo and PeroK
Apart from what has already been said, just a bit of terminology: If there is friction, the object is not in free fall.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: torito_verdejo

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K