Equilibrium on a Beam: Determining Forces at Different Points

  • Thread starter Thread starter tigerwoods99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a uniform beam supported at two walls, focusing on the forces exerted by the walls and the effects of a person's weight at various positions along the beam. The subject area includes concepts of static equilibrium, torque, and forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for the forces at points A and B, questioning the dimensions used in torque calculations and the inclusion of the beam's weight and the person's weight in the equations. There is an exploration of how to sum torques about different points to find unknown forces.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the torque calculations, suggesting summing torques about specific points to solve for unknown forces. There is acknowledgment of correct answers for parts 'a' and 'b', while parts 'c' and 'd' remain under discussion with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with dimensions and the necessity of correctly factoring in the weights involved. There is an emphasis on ensuring the correct setup of the problem before proceeding with calculations.

tigerwoods99
Messages
99
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 20.0 m long uniform beam weighing 670 N is supported on walls A and B, as shown in Fig. 9-77.
http://www.webassign.net/giancoli5/9_77.gif

(a) Find the maximum weight a person can be to walk to the extreme end D without tipping the beam.
(b) Find the forces that the walls A and B exert on the beam when the same person is standing at point D.
(c) Find the forces that the walls A and B exert on the beam when the same person is standing at a point 2.0 m to the right of B.
(d) Find the forces that the walls A and B exert on the beam when the same person is standing 2.0 m to the right of A.

I figured out A + B but not C and D.


Homework Equations



sigma Fy = 0
sigma FTorque = 0


The Attempt at a Solution




FA = beam A
FB= beam B
mg= mass of beam * 9.8
FC= the person


a) 670N
b) 0 N from wall A and 1340N from wall B
C) using FA as the pivot: 0FAsin90 + 12FBsin90 -8.5mgsin90 - 15FCsin90 = 0
12FB - 15745 = 0
FB = 1312.08 WHICH IS NOT CORRECT.
D)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have your dimensions wrong. If summing torques about A, the distance fron the cg of the beam to A, for example, is 7 feet. Also, you don't need m and g, since the force units of weight are already given.
 
b) 0 N from wall A and 1340N from wall B
C) using FA as the pivot: 0FAsin90 + 12FBsin90 -8.5mgsin90 - 15FCsin90 = 0
12FB - 15745 = 0
FB = 1312.08 WHICH IS NOT CORRECT.

What's FC? Where did you factor in the weight of the beam or the weight of the person?
 
ideasrule said:
What's FC? Where did you factor in the weight of the beam or the weight of the person?

FC = the force of the person on the beam as mentioned in the question.

The weight of the beam is mg.

Thanks.
 
PhanthomJay said:
You have your dimensions wrong. If summing torques about A, the distance fron the cg of the beam to A, for example, is 7 feet. Also, you don't need m and g, since the force units of weight are already given.

Thanks jay. Your correct the mg is 7 feet to the right of the FA, or beam A. When i wrote mg i was referring to the Force units.

How do i go from here?

Thanks!
 
tigerwoods99 said:
Thanks jay. Your correct the mg is 7 feet to the right of the FA, or beam A. When i wrote mg i was referring to the Force units.

How do i go from here?

Thanks!
You do have parts 'a' and 'b' correct. For part 'c', try summing torques about point A, and solve for the unknown reaction force at B. Then solve for the unknown reaction force at A by summing forces in the y direction = 0. As a check, sum torques about point B = 0 to determine the reaction force at A. You can solve part 'd' in a similar fashion.
 
PhanthomJay said:
You do have parts 'a' and 'b' correct. For part 'c', try summing torques about point A, and solve for the unknown reaction force at B. Then solve for the unknown reaction force at A by summing forces in the y direction = 0. As a check, sum torques about point B = 0 to determine the reaction force at A. You can solve part 'd' in a similar fashion.

Thanks Phanthom Jay!

Could you take a look at this: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2544626

Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
12K