# Find the mass M so that the net torque is zero

In summary, the beam is supported by a blue structure and a counterweight is needed to avoid it from tipping over. If the beam is moved to the right or left of the blue point the counterweight will affect the magnitude of the torques. If the beam is moved up or down the blue point the counterweight will affect the direction of the torque. The mass needed to balance the beam at the blue point is determined by the sum of the two torques.

## Homework Statement

Hello, I have a problem I don't want how to approach, it is a little weird. It is a problem of equilibrium (torque)

The situation and my approach is in the picture I uploaded. A beam is supported by the blue structure. On the beam it is a person(100N) at a distance of 3m in
the overhang part. In order to avoid that the beam turns over, it is placed a counterweight of mass M in the middle of the supported part. The goal is to find
the needed mass of the counterweight.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.

T net=0
Fy net=0

## The Attempt at a Solution

My approach: Since 2m of the beam is supported by a structure, I think the structure will produce a distrubuted load of reaction, but that does not matter since we can
use use a single reaction in the middle of the distributed load ( at 1m from the end in this case, as I showed in the figure). The problem is the next:
If I apply torque in the red point ( the point under the counterweight), only the 100N will exert a torque, which is wrong because the system must be in equilibrium.
I would get that -400 N.m =0 If I apply torque in the blue point (at the right end of the blue support structure), all forces will exert torque. I set up my equation and I got -300-R-M=0
Then I find the second equation with the summation of forces, and I got R=100+M. For last I replaced this last equaqtion into the first to find M.
But again I got -400 N.m = 0.

I do not think I've forgotten some reaction force somewhere ... I am thinking right now that I don't have to take into account that reaction force in that way, because once the beam starts to turn over, the normal force (reaction force) will vanish. I meant, I will only have a reaction force in the "pivot ( blue point
in the drawing)". In that case the problem will be very easy to solve, but I am not sure of that approach. The second image I uploaded shows that approach.

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

#### Attachments

• _20180522_141104.JPG
41.5 KB · Views: 409
• Sin título.png
1 KB · Views: 414
unless the beam is attached to the blue structure it won't supply any support at all. if you look at your png again, you can see that the beam is lifted left of the the blue point.

The beam is lifted left of the blue point and lowered on the right of the blue point. so the beam rotates around the blue point.

Marc Rindermann said:
unless the beam is attached to the blue structure it won't supply any support at all. if you look at your png again, you can see that the beam is lifted left of the the blue point.

The beam is lifted left of the blue point and lowered on the right of the blue point. so the beam rotates around the blue point.
Alright, that is what I think, so my last approach (and picutre) are the correct.

you want to know what the mass ##M## must be to balance the beam on the blue pivot point. That means the sum of torques must be zero or, since the the torques act on either side of the pivot point, they must be equal in magnitude.

So you have one mass at ##3m## to the right of the pivot point creating a torque ##T = 100 N \times 3 m = 300 Nm##. Also, you have a mass ##M## at ##r = 2m## to the left of the pivot point that creating a torque in the opposite direction. ##T = r F## with ##F = Mg##.

that should give you enough information to solve for ##M##.

correction: Mass ##M## is at ##r = 1m##.

In your method 2 you've got two torques ##M## and ##R## but there should only be one. Torque on the red point should balance out the torque by the person

once the beam starts to turn over, the normal force (reaction force) will vanish. I meant, I will only have a reaction force in the "pivot ( blue point
Correct. More generally, you cannot assume that the normal force from a flat support is evenly distributed (or, equivalently, at the midpoint of the contact length). E.g. if you increase the balancing mass beyond the minimum necessary then, effectively, the normal force will be at whatever point balances all the forces and torques.

CWatters
If I have understood the set up...

There is a minimum value for the mass m needed to keep it in equilibrium. At that value of m all of the reaction force from the supporting structure is located at the blue dot.

For greater values of m it's impossible to work out how the reaction force is distributed without more information but it is in likely to be uniform.

You could solve it for specific cases. For example if the support made contact with the beam at just two points. Might also be possible to solve if there was something like a rubber block between the beam and support that deformed in a known way?

Got it! thank to all of you for the help

## 1. What is the definition of torque in physics?

Torque is a measure of the force that causes an object to rotate around an axis. It is calculated by multiplying the force applied to an object by the distance between the axis of rotation and the point where the force is applied.

## 2. How is torque related to the mass of an object?

The mass of an object is directly proportional to its torque. This means that the greater the mass of an object, the greater the torque required to rotate it.

## 3. What is meant by "net torque"?

Net torque refers to the overall torque acting on an object. It is calculated by taking into account all the individual torques acting on the object and determining whether they cause the object to rotate clockwise or counterclockwise.

## 4. How do you find the mass M so that the net torque is zero?

In order for the net torque to be zero, the sum of all the clockwise torques must equal the sum of all the counterclockwise torques. To find the mass M, you would need to manipulate the equation to solve for M.

## 5. Why is it important for the net torque to be zero?

If the net torque is zero, it means that the object is in rotational equilibrium and will not rotate in any direction. This is important in situations where balance and stability are necessary, such as in the construction of buildings and bridges.