Equipotentials and electrical field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the relationship between electric fields and equipotential lines, confirming that the electric field is stronger where equipotential lines are closer together. It emphasizes that the electric field represents the rate of change of electrostatic potential with respect to displacement. Additionally, it distinguishes between equipotential lines, which do not have arrows, and electric field lines, which indicate the direction of force on a positive charge. The context of measuring potential is also highlighted, noting that it can depend on the chosen reference point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and electric fields
  • Familiarity with equipotential lines and their properties
  • Knowledge of capacitors and voltage concepts
  • Basic principles of electric potential difference
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of electric field strength and its mathematical representation
  • Learn about the relationship between equipotential surfaces and electric fields
  • Explore the behavior of electric fields within capacitors
  • Investigate the significance of reference points in measuring electric potential
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of electrostatics and the behavior of electric fields in relation to equipotential lines.

nweis
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Just a quick question. The electrical field is stronger where the voltage is higher right?
Or does it have to do with how close together the equipotential lines are?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If by "voltage" you mean "electrostatic potential difference between two separate points in space", the answer is yes.

The second question should not be an "Or". In a region where equipotentials are closer together over a distance of, say, 1 meter, the electric field is stronger there than in another region where the equipotentials are farther apart over a distance of 1 meter.

After all, the electric field is the rate of change of electrostatic potential with respect to displacement in the direction of maximum change of electric potential.
 
Is the direction of a potential arrow the direction in which a positive particle would move?
 
JanClaesen said:
Is the direction of a potential arrow the direction in which a positive particle would move?
"Potential arrow"? The equi-potential lines should have no arrows. They are perpendicular to the field lines. Arrows on a field line point in the direction a positive particle would move.
 
JanClaesen said:
Is the direction of a potential arrow the direction in which a positive particle would move?

Equipotential lines do not have arrows, but field lines do. The direction of the arrow on an electric field line shows the direction in which a positive particle is accelerated.
 
I'm sorry, it was indeed not a very clever question. Do we measure potential from the negative plate, or does that depend on the context?
 
Last edited:
It will depend on the context. There should be a designated reference point from which potential is measured, which could be the negative plate.

When a HW problem or discussion about capacitors refers to "the voltage" of the capacitor, they mean the potential difference between the positive and negative plates.

Note, getting back to the original question, the electric field inside a capacitor is constant between the two plates. The field is not stronger at the the positive plate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
899
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K