MHB Equivalence Classes of Bracelet Beads: Red, White, Blue

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on defining equivalence classes for bracelets made of three beads, each colored red, white, or blue. The relation R identifies two bracelets as equivalent if one can be obtained from the other through rotation or reflection. Participants clarify that each equivalence class corresponds to a unique bracelet configuration. Examples of equivalence classes include combinations like (red, red, red) and (red, red, blue) along with its rotations and reflections. The goal is to determine all unique bracelet configurations based on these transformations, emphasizing the importance of accounting for symmetry in the classification process.
linag96
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Each bead on a bracelet with three beads is either red,
white, or blue.
Define the relation R between bracelets as: (B1, B2),
where B1 and B2 are bracelets, belongs to R if and only
if B2 can be obtained from B1 by rotating it or rotating it
and then reflecting it.
What are the equivalence classes of R?

I'm a little lost on how to make these classes, is it just something like
(red, blue, white), (red, white, blue), (blue, red, white), (blue, white, red) etc?
Thank you for your help.
 
Technology news on Phys.org
linag96 said:
Each bead on a bracelet with three beads is either red,
white, or blue.
Define the relation R between bracelets as: (B1, B2),
where B1 and B2 are bracelets, belongs to R if and only
if B2 can be obtained from B1 by rotating it or rotating it
and then reflecting it.
What are the equivalence classes of R?

I'm a little lost on how to make these classes, is it just something like
(red, blue, white), (red, white, blue), (blue, red, white), (blue, white, red) etc?
Thank you for your help.

Hi linag96! ;)

Yes it is.
For instance {(red,red,red)} is an equivalence class.
And so is {(red,red,blue), (red,blue,red), (blue,red,red)}.
Which would the other classes be? (Wondering)

Btw, note that each equivalence class corresponds to a unique bracelet.
We are effectively finding the number of unique bracelets.

\begin{tikzpicture}
%preamble \usetikzlibrary{arrows,shadows}
[>=stealth',font=\large,scale=1,very thick,
button/.style 2 args={%
circle,
minimum size=0.6cm,
top color=#1!40!white,
bottom color=#1!60!black,
draw=#1!90!black,
thick,
general shadow={%
shadow xshift=.4ex, shadow yshift=-.4ex,
opacity=.5, fill=black!50,
}
}]
\newcommand{\bracelet}[4]
{%
\draw #1 node[button={#2}{}] (A) {1}
+(1,-0.5) node[button={#3}{}] (B) {2}
+(2,0) node[button={#4}{}] (C) {3};
\draw[bend right] (A) edge (B) (B) edge (C) (C) edge (A);
}

\node at (-1,0) {\LARGE $\{$};
\bracelet{}{red}{red}{red};
\node at (3,0) {\LARGE $\}$};

\node at (-1,-2) {\LARGE $\{$};
\bracelet{(0,-2)}{red}{red}{green};
\bracelet{(3,-2)}{red}{green}{red};
\bracelet{(6,-2)}{green}{red}{red};
\node at (9,-2) {\LARGE $\}$};

\end{tikzpicture}
 
Last edited:
Dear Peeps I have posted a few questions about programing on this sectio of the PF forum. I want to ask you veterans how you folks learn program in assembly and about computer architecture for the x86 family. In addition to finish learning C, I am also reading the book From bits to Gates to C and Beyond. In the book, it uses the mini LC3 assembly language. I also have books on assembly programming and computer architecture. The few famous ones i have are Computer Organization and...
I have a quick questions. I am going through a book on C programming on my own. Afterwards, I plan to go through something call data structures and algorithms on my own also in C. I also need to learn C++, Matlab and for personal interest Haskell. For the two topic of data structures and algorithms, I understand there are standard ones across all programming languages. After learning it through C, what would be the biggest issue when trying to implement the same data...

Similar threads

Back
Top