MHB Equivalence Classes of Bracelet Beads: Red, White, Blue

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on defining equivalence classes for bracelets made of three beads, each colored red, white, or blue. The relation R identifies two bracelets as equivalent if one can be obtained from the other through rotation or reflection. Participants clarify that each equivalence class corresponds to a unique bracelet configuration. Examples of equivalence classes include combinations like (red, red, red) and (red, red, blue) along with its rotations and reflections. The goal is to determine all unique bracelet configurations based on these transformations, emphasizing the importance of accounting for symmetry in the classification process.
linag96
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Each bead on a bracelet with three beads is either red,
white, or blue.
Define the relation R between bracelets as: (B1, B2),
where B1 and B2 are bracelets, belongs to R if and only
if B2 can be obtained from B1 by rotating it or rotating it
and then reflecting it.
What are the equivalence classes of R?

I'm a little lost on how to make these classes, is it just something like
(red, blue, white), (red, white, blue), (blue, red, white), (blue, white, red) etc?
Thank you for your help.
 
Technology news on Phys.org
linag96 said:
Each bead on a bracelet with three beads is either red,
white, or blue.
Define the relation R between bracelets as: (B1, B2),
where B1 and B2 are bracelets, belongs to R if and only
if B2 can be obtained from B1 by rotating it or rotating it
and then reflecting it.
What are the equivalence classes of R?

I'm a little lost on how to make these classes, is it just something like
(red, blue, white), (red, white, blue), (blue, red, white), (blue, white, red) etc?
Thank you for your help.

Hi linag96! ;)

Yes it is.
For instance {(red,red,red)} is an equivalence class.
And so is {(red,red,blue), (red,blue,red), (blue,red,red)}.
Which would the other classes be? (Wondering)

Btw, note that each equivalence class corresponds to a unique bracelet.
We are effectively finding the number of unique bracelets.

\begin{tikzpicture}
%preamble \usetikzlibrary{arrows,shadows}
[>=stealth',font=\large,scale=1,very thick,
button/.style 2 args={%
circle,
minimum size=0.6cm,
top color=#1!40!white,
bottom color=#1!60!black,
draw=#1!90!black,
thick,
general shadow={%
shadow xshift=.4ex, shadow yshift=-.4ex,
opacity=.5, fill=black!50,
}
}]
\newcommand{\bracelet}[4]
{%
\draw #1 node[button={#2}{}] (A) {1}
+(1,-0.5) node[button={#3}{}] (B) {2}
+(2,0) node[button={#4}{}] (C) {3};
\draw[bend right] (A) edge (B) (B) edge (C) (C) edge (A);
}

\node at (-1,0) {\LARGE $\{$};
\bracelet{}{red}{red}{red};
\node at (3,0) {\LARGE $\}$};

\node at (-1,-2) {\LARGE $\{$};
\bracelet{(0,-2)}{red}{red}{green};
\bracelet{(3,-2)}{red}{green}{red};
\bracelet{(6,-2)}{green}{red}{red};
\node at (9,-2) {\LARGE $\}$};

\end{tikzpicture}
 
Last edited:
Anthropic announced that an inflection point has been reached where the LLM tools are good enough to help or hinder cybersecurity folks. In the most recent case in September 2025, state hackers used Claude in Agentic mode to break into 30+ high-profile companies, of which 17 or so were actually breached before Anthropic shut it down. They mentioned that Clause hallucinated and told the hackers it was more successful than it was...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
682
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
19K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K