B Equivalence of Frictional and Applied Force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of frictional forces as described in Halliday Resnick Krane's text. It clarifies that when the frictional force equals the applied spring force, the body moves at constant velocity due to zero net force, indicating no acceleration. The conversation distinguishes between static and kinetic friction, noting that static friction holds the body until the applied force exceeds its limit, leading to sliding. Once in motion, kinetic friction, which is lower than static friction, allows the body to continue moving at a constant velocity. This understanding is crucial for grasping the principles of dynamics in one dimension.
mopit_011
Messages
17
Reaction score
8
TL;DR Summary
We can measure frictional forces. By placing the body on a horizontal surface where it experiences a frictional force, we could attach a spring and pull the body with just the right force so that it moves at constant velocity. Why would the body begin moving when the frictional force becomes equivalent to the applied force by the spring?
The following passage is from Halliday Resnick Krane in Chapter 3 which is about dynamics in one dimension.

"We can measure frictional forces. By placing the body on a horizontal surface where it experiences a frictional force, we could attach a spring and pull the body with just the right force so that it moves at constant velocity."

I had assumed that the passage was talking about static frictional force and do not understand why when the frictional force is equal to the applied spring force, the body would move at constant velocity. Wouldn't the net force still be 0 Newtons on the body meaning that it does not accelerate? Thank you so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mopit_011 said:
I had assumed that the passage was talking about static frictional force and do not understand why when the frictional force is equal to the applied spring force, the body would move at constant velocity. Wouldn't the net force still be 0 Newtons on the body meaning that it does not accelerate? Thank you so much!

Are you confusing acceleration and velocity? A body that moves at constant velocity has zero acceleration. "Zero" is a special case of constant velocity.
 
mopit_011 said:
... I had assumed that the passage was talking about static frictional force and do not understand why when the frictional force is equal to the applied spring force, the body would move at constant velocity. Wouldn't the net force still be 0 Newtons on the body meaning that it does not accelerate? Thank you so much!
I believe that the passage was referring to both, static and kinetic forms of friction between the static body and surface first, and then to the relative movement.

Clarification: Because the third law of Newton, the magnitude of the static frictional force is always equal to the magnitude of the spring force, from zero up to its limit (normal force times coefficient of static friction).

Once the magnitude of the force pulling or pushing our spring becomes greater than that limit, the body "detaches" from the "static grip" of the surface, and starts slidding over it.

After a small period of aceleration, the body should start sliding at constant velocity, as a new balance between kinetic friction and spring force is reached.

Because the value of the kinetic coefficient of friction is always smaller than the static one, the spring force should be constant and of lower value than the earlier reached max limit while the body keeps sliding at constant velocity (same velocity at which the force pulling or pushing the spring keeps moving).

You can find a better explanation here:
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-osuniversityphysics/chapter/6-2-friction/
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top