Equivalence of Metrics and Completeness in Metric Spaces

[fk378]

Homework Statement

We say that two metrics d, d' on a space S are equivalent if each "dominates" the other in the following sense: there exist constants M, M'>0 such that
d'(x,y)<=M' d(x,y) and d(x,y)<=M d'(x,y) for all x,y in S.

If metrics d, d' are equivalent, prove that (S,d) is complete<==>(S,d') is a complete metric space.

The Attempt at a Solution

If (S,d) is complete then every Cauchy sequence in S converges to a limit in S. I want to go somewhere along the lines of saying that multiplying by a constant will not change its convergence...am I going along the right lines here? I don't really know how else to go about this.

 

[morphism]

Let's do the => direction first. Take a cauchy sequence {x_n} in (S,d'). Is {x_n} cauchy in (S,d)?

 

[fk378]

I'm guessing it is yes. Because we have M' that we can multiply the sequence by?

 

[HallsofIvy]

And, of course, a sequence convertes if and only if "given \epsilon&gt; 0, there exist N such that ...

Given \epsilon&gt; 0 in d', what does that tell you about \epsilon/M&#039; in d?

 

[fk378]

And, of course, a sequence convertes if and only if "given \epsilon&gt; 0, there exist N such that ...

Given \epsilon&gt; 0 in d', what does that tell you about \epsilon/M&#039; in d?

To finish the first part of your response, "there exists N such that..."
is the end of that "n larger than N will be equal to some epsilon>0"?

For the second part, epsilon/M' will be some small value in d...?

 

[HallsofIvy]

If d(x_n, L)&lt; \epsilon[/tex] for all n&gt; N, then d&amp;#039;(x_n,L)= M&amp;#039;\epsilon and conversely.