Equivalent resistor of 2011 resistor web

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 3K views
pincopallino
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
1. let's have 2011 point each pair connected by a resitor R. what is the equivalent resistor between each pair of points conneced by R?



2. due to the symmetry the equivalent resistor between two arbitrary point connected by R is always the same. let's take two of this contigouspoins. the voltage at each other point is the same, due to the symmetry (is it right?), but then?



The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
pincopallino said:
1. let's have 2011 point each pair connected by a resitor R. what is the equivalent resistor between each pair of points conneced by R?



2. due to the symmetry the equivalent resistor between two arbitrary point connected by R is always the same. let's take two of this contigouspoins. the voltage at each other point is the same, due to the symmetry (is it right?), but then?



The Attempt at a Solution


Can you please describe the problem in more detail, and maybe show us a diagram?

What do you mean by 2011 points? What is their geometry? 2-dimensional, 3-dimensional? What shape?
 
in attachment a diagram for 5 points.
 

Attachments

pincopallino said:
in attachment a diagram for 5 points.

You are required to show your work on schoolwork questions. What is the answer for 3 poinsts? For 5 points? etc.

And where did this question come from?
 
it is a question from our teacher.
it is evident that using standard method of resolution (kirchoff or whatever) is absurd, as it would get to a big linear sistem of equations.
for three is easy Req=2/3R. for four, it' s eay as well, as for symmetry reason the free twi point are at hte same voltage, so Req=R/2.
but 5, 6 , 7 ...2011 points? is the generalization that all the other points are equipotential corrct?
 
Of course Kirchoff is not an option.
But it looks like you already know the solution, at least partially.
 
I would like, but I do not have.
there must be some trick.
isn't there on line in the WEB any free circuit resolutor?
 
pincopallino said:
I would like, but I do not have.
there must be some trick.
isn't there on line in the WEB any free circuit resolutor?

Not in this case.
But your intuition was fine.