MHB Equivalent Statements to COmpactness .... Stromberg, Theorem 3.43 .... ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent Theorem
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding Theorem 3.43 from Karl R. Stromberg's "An Introduction to Classical Real Analysis," specifically regarding the concept of density in topological spaces. A set A is defined as dense in X if its closure equals X, meaning every point in X can be approximated by points in A. Participants clarify that for any point z in X and any ε > 0, there exists a point x in A such that the distance ρ(x, z) is less than ε/2. This is due to the nature of dense sets, where every point in X is either in A or a limit point of A. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the definitions and implications of density in real analysis.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Equivalent Statements to Compactness ... Stromberg, Theorem 3.43 ... ...

I am reading Karl R. Stromberg's book: "An Introduction to Classical Real Analysis". ... ...

I am focused on Chapter 3: Limits and Continuity ... ...

I need help in order to fully understand the proof of Theorem 3.43 on pages 105-106 ... ... Theorem 3.43 and its proof read as follows:View attachment 9144
View attachment 9145

At about the middle of the above proof by Stromberg we read the following:

" ... ...Next select $$x \in A$$ such that $$\rho (x, z) \lt \epsilon / 2$$ [$$A$$ is dense] ... ... "My question is as follows:

Can someone demonstrate rigorously how $$A$$ is dense in $$X$$ guarantees that we can select $$x \in A$$ such that $$\rho (x, z) \lt \epsilon / 2$$ ... ...
Stromberg defines dense in X as follows ... ...

A set $$A \subset X$$ is dense in $$X$$ if $$A^{ - } = X$$.

Hope someone can help ...

Peter
========================================================================================It may help MHB readers to have access to Stromberg's terminology associated with topological spaces ... so I am providing access to the main definitions ... as follows:
View attachment 9146

Hope that helps ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Stromberg - 1 - Theorem 3.43 ... ... PART 1 ... .... .png
    Stromberg - 1 - Theorem 3.43 ... ... PART 1 ... .... .png
    46.1 KB · Views: 142
  • Stromberg - 2 - Theorem 3.43 ... ... PART 2 ... .... ... .png
    Stromberg - 2 - Theorem 3.43 ... ... PART 2 ... .... ... .png
    57 KB · Views: 140
  • Stromberg -  Defn 3.11  ... Terminology for Topological Spaces ... .png
    Stromberg - Defn 3.11 ... Terminology for Topological Spaces ... .png
    24.6 KB · Views: 147
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have "A set A is dense in X if $D^-= X$. Doesn't Stromberg define "$D^-$ for a set A? Is it defined as the closure of A? I would think that would be $A^-$ rather than "D"! Where did the "D" come from?

(Actually the definition given later in what you copied is for "set D", not "set A".)

Your question
"
Can someone demonstrate rigorously how [FONT=MathJax_Math]A is dense in [FONT=MathJax_Math]X guarantees that we can select [FONT=MathJax_Math]x[FONT=MathJax_Main]∈[FONT=MathJax_Math]A such that [FONT=MathJax_Math]ρ[FONT=MathJax_Main]([FONT=MathJax_Math]x[FONT=MathJax_Main],[FONT=MathJax_Math]z[FONT=MathJax_Main])[FONT=MathJax_Main]<[FONT=MathJax_Math]ϵ[FONT=MathJax_Main]/[FONT=MathJax_Main]2"[FONT=MathJax_Math]ρ[FONT=MathJax_Main]([FONT=MathJax_Math]x[FONT=MathJax_Main],[FONT=MathJax_Math]z[FONT=MathJax_Main])[FONT=MathJax_Main]<[FONT=MathJax_Math]ϵ[FONT=MathJax_Main]/[FONT=MathJax_Main]2" makes no sense without saying what "z" is. In a part you did not copy z is given as any point in X. The definition of "A is dense in X" is that the closure of A is X. And the closure or A is A union its limit points. That is, if "A is dense in X" then every point of A is a limit point of X. That, in turn, means that, given any $\epsilon> 0$, every point of X, in particular, z, has some point of X, x, such that $d(z, x)< \epsilon$. But if $\epsilon> 0$, so is $\epsilon/2$ so we can as well use $\epsilon/2$. [FONT=MathJax_Math]ρ[FONT=MathJax_Main]([FONT=MathJax_Math]x[FONT=MathJax_Main],[FONT=MathJax_Math]z[FONT=MathJax_Main])[FONT=MathJax_Main]<[FONT=MathJax_Math]ϵ[FONT=MathJax_Main]/[FONT=MathJax_Main]2?" Doesn[FONT=MathJax_Main])[FONT=MathJax_Main]<[FONT=MathJax_Math]ϵ[FONT=MathJax_Main]/[FONT=MathJax_Main]2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
You have "A set A is dense in X if $D^-= X$. Doesn't Stromberg define "$D^-$ for a set A? Is it defined as the closure of A? I would think that would be $A^-$ rather than "D"! Where did the "D" come from?

(Actually the definition given later in what you copied is for "set D", not "set A".)

Your question
"
Can someone demonstrate rigorously how [FONT=MathJax_Math]A is dense in [FONT=MathJax_Math]X guarantees that we can select [FONT=MathJax_Math]x[FONT=MathJax_Main]∈[FONT=MathJax_Math]A such that [FONT=MathJax_Math]ρ[FONT=MathJax_Main]([FONT=MathJax_Math]x[FONT=MathJax_Main],[FONT=MathJax_Math]z[FONT=MathJax_Main])[FONT=MathJax_Main]<[FONT=MathJax_Math]ϵ[FONT=MathJax_Main]/[FONT=MathJax_Main]2"[FONT=MathJax_Math]ρ[FONT=MathJax_Main]([FONT=MathJax_Math]x[FONT=MathJax_Main],[FONT=MathJax_Math]z[FONT=MathJax_Main])[FONT=MathJax_Main]<[FONT=MathJax_Math]ϵ[FONT=MathJax_Main]/[FONT=MathJax_Main]2"makes no sense without saying what "z" is. In a part you did not copy z is given as any point in X. The definition of "A is dense in X" is that the closure of A is X. And the closure or A is A union its limit points. That is, if "A is dense in X" then every point of A is a limit point of X. That, in turn, means that, given any $\epsilon> 0$, every point of X, in particular, z, has some point of X, x, such that $d(z, x)< \epsilon$. But if $\epsilon> 0$, so is $\epsilon/2$ so we can as well use $\epsilon/2$.

[FONT=MathJax_Math]ρ[FONT=MathJax_Main]([FONT=MathJax_Math]x[FONT=MathJax_Main],[FONT=MathJax_Math]z[FONT=MathJax_Main])[FONT=MathJax_Main]<[FONT=MathJax_Math]ϵ[FONT=MathJax_Main]/[FONT=MathJax_Main]2?" Doesn[FONT=MathJax_Main])[FONT=MathJax_Main]<[FONT=MathJax_Math]ϵ[FONT=MathJax_Main]/[FONT=MathJax_Main]2

Thanks for the help, HallsofIvy ...

Sorry about the typo in the definition of "$$A$$ is dense in $$X$$" ... ... I have corrected it in my post above ...

Regarding the definition of $$z$$, I left that for the reader to get from the scanned text ... ...Now ... you write:

" ... ... the closure of $$A$$ is $$A$$ union its limit points. That is, if "$$A$$ is dense in $$X$$" then every point of $$A$$ is a limit point of $$X$$. ... ... "I am having trouble seeing exactly why this is true ... ...Can you please explain how/why

$$A^- = A \cup \{ x \in X \ : \ x \text{ is a limit point of } A \} = X $$

$$\Longrightarrow$$ every point of $$A$$ is a limit point of $$X$$ ... ...
Hope you can help further ...

Peter

 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K