Equivalent stress in a welded part

  • Thread starter Thread starter guideonl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent Stress
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of equivalent stress in welded parts subjected to torque and bending stresses. Participants explore different equations for determining equivalent stress and the appropriate use of symbols in engineering contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the practical equivalent stress can be calculated using the square root of the sum of squared shear stresses from torque and equal shear, plus the squared normal stress from bending.
  • Another participant questions whether it is common to use this method or if the equivalent stress should be computed using a two-dimensional equation involving three times the shear stress squared.
  • There is mention of an alternative equation that uses two times the shear stress squared instead of three, with one participant suggesting it could be a typographic mistake or specific to certain materials.
  • Participants discuss the clarity and accuracy of the equations presented, with one asserting that the second equation is more accurate than the first.
  • There is a request for guidance on using engineering symbols in forum posts, specifically for Greek letters representing normal and shear stresses.
  • Another participant provides information on standard symbology for typing mathematical equations in plain text.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and accuracy of the equations for equivalent stress, with no consensus reached on which method is preferable. The discussion on symbol usage also remains unresolved, with participants providing different suggestions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the equations may depend on specific material properties or contexts, and there is uncertainty regarding the typographic accuracy of the coefficients used in the equations.

guideonl
Messages
58
Reaction score
6
Hi everyone,

The practical equivalent stress in a welded part, subjected to torque and bending stresses, is the square root of the sum of the two squared shear stresses (from torque & equal shear) squared, + the normal stress (from bending) squared. Is it accepted/common to use this way to get the equivalent stress, or it must be computed from the 2 dimensional equation for the equivalent stress = the squared root of normal stress squared + 3 times the shear stress squared?
By the way, I found somewhere a similar equation to that mentioned above, with 2 times the shear stress squared instead of 3 times the shear stress squared. Is it a mistake or just another method?
Also, I am new in this forum, and I would like to know if there is a simpler way to present questions using engineering known formulas & symbols? If positive - please advise how to do so.

Thank you, Guideon
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
guideonl: The 2 might be a typographic mistake, or might be applicable to a specific material, if clearly described. If in doubt, assume the 2 is a typographic mistake, and use 3, instead.

The first equation you described, although it is hard to understand the way you wrote it, appears to be a simplistic approximation, and not too accurate. The second equation you described is more accurate and more correct.

Yes, there is a standard symbology for typing mathematical equations in plain text. Use caret (^) for exponentiation, asterisk (*) for multiplication, solidus (/) for division, plus sign (+) for addition, hyphen (-) for subtraction, and parentheses (( )), brackets ([ ]), and braces ({ }) for grouping. The precedence of the above arithmetic operators, in order of decreasing precedence from left to right, is:

- (unary) ( ) ^ * / + -​

Therefore, an example of an equation is y = pi*[2*x^3 - (5*x)^2]/(3*x^0.5). Notice square root of x is written x^0.5. And notice in 2*x^3, x^3 is performed before multiplying by 2, because exponentiation has higher precedence than multiplication (see the above precedence list). Also, pi means 3.141 593.
 
nvn said:
guideonl: The 2 might be a typographic mistake, or might be applicable to a specific material, if clearly described. If in doubt, assume the 2 is a typographic mistake, and use 3, instead.

The first equation you described, although it is hard to understand the way you wrote it, appears to be a simplistic approximation, and not too accurate. The second equation you described is more accurate and more correct.

Yes, there is a standard symbology for typing mathematical equations in plain text. Use caret (^) for exponentiation, asterisk (*) for multiplication, solidus (/) for division, plus sign (+) for addition, hyphen (-) for subtraction, and parentheses (( )), brackets ([ ]), and braces ({ }) for grouping. The precedence of the above arithmetic operators, in order of decreasing precedence from left to right, is:

- (unary) ( ) ^ * / + -​

Therefore, an example of an equation is y = pi*[2*x^3 - (5*x)^2]/(3*x^0.5). Notice square root of x is written x^0.5. And notice in 2*x^3, x^3 is performed before multiplying by 2, because exponentiation has higher precedence than multiplication (see the above precedence list). Also, pi means 3.141 593.

Thank you nvn,
I am familiar with the symbols you wrote in your answer, but in my question related to symbols, I meant symbols for the stresses (such as sigma & tau Greek letters for the normal & shear stresses). How can I use such symbols at this forum?

Guideon
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
17K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K