Error Propagation Homework: Wheatstone Bridge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on error propagation in a Wheatstone bridge experiment to determine an unknown resistance using the formula Ru = (x/(1-x))*(Rs). The user seeks clarification on applying partial derivatives and the propagated error equation. The proposed error propagation formula is Error Ru = (Rs)√(((1/(x(1-x)))^2(σx)^2 + (σRs/Rs)^2)). The user questions whether to calculate a single error value for the entire series of measurements or separate values for each set of x and Rs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Wheatstone bridge principles
  • Familiarity with error propagation techniques
  • Basic knowledge of partial derivatives
  • Experience with standard deviation calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study error propagation in experimental physics
  • Learn about partial derivatives in the context of multivariable calculus
  • Research the application of standard deviation in measurement uncertainty
  • Explore advanced topics in resistance measurement techniques
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, laboratory technicians, and anyone involved in experimental design and data analysis, particularly in the context of electrical resistance measurements.

Yatty33
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have completed a lab that uses a Wheatstone bridge to find an unknown resistance utitlizing a resistance box and a slide wire.

This will yield the unknown resistance from the following formula...
Ru = unknown resistance
Rs = known resistance from the resistance box
x = distance from 0 on the slide wire in meters

Ru = (x/(1-x))*(Rs)

So for the unknown resistance, I took 3 values of x, and Rs (because Rs changes on the slide wire as x increases)

So here's my problem. I don't know how to do partial derivatives, except in the most basic way, or how to apply the propagated error equation.

The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt:

Error Ru = (Rs)\sqrt{}((1/(x(1-x)))^2(\sigma x)^2 + (\sigma Rs/(Rs))^2))

With \sigma whatever being the standard deviation.

The question here is, did I do this correctly?

If I did do this correctly, should I get one value for my error propagation for the entire series of measurments or should I get 3 different error propagations (3 different x, 3 different Rs)?

Will there be 3 different values for error propagation then?

Thanks for your help!

P.S. This is my first post, but I have been using PF for physics help the last 2 semesters, awesome website. This is the first time I've ever had to post something on here :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one at all?
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
813
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
732
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K