Escape Velocity and Short-Distance Space Travel: Understanding the Science

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of escape velocity in the context of space travel, specifically regarding missions to the Moon or Mars. Participants are exploring why escape velocity is relevant for relatively short distances compared to the notion of traveling an infinite distance away from Earth.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the necessity of achieving escape velocity for missions that do not involve traveling infinitely far from Earth. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between escape velocity and the gravitational pull of Earth, as well as the implications of launching with escape velocity without propulsion.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between escape velocity and the distances involved in space travel. There is an ongoing exploration of how much of the escape velocity is needed to reach the Moon and the implications of gravitational potential energy at varying distances. The discussion is active, with multiple interpretations being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and implications of escape velocity, particularly in relation to finite distances in space travel. There is a mention of specific velocity values needed for different stages of travel, highlighting the complexity of the topic.

blackcat
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
can someone please help:

i know escape velocity is the velocity you need to give an object for it exit the pull of the Earth and travel an infinite distance away from earth.

now let's say you have a space shuttle that you need to take to Mars or the moon or something. why would you need to give it the escape velocity when you're only going a few million kilometres and not anywhere near an "infinite distance" away?

so how does that make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ow let's say you have a space shuttle that you need to take to Mars or the moon or something. why would you need to give it the escape velocity when you're only going a few million kilometres and not anywhere near an "infinite distance" away?
It doesn't matter where/how far you are going. You just need that velocity to escape the gravitational attraction so it won't fall back down. From there is up to the space shuttle where to go.

Dont use "infinite distance away from earth", you'll confuse yourself. For simplicity sake, it should be finite distance.
 
thanks, but i still don't quite understand.

what will happen if you launch with escape velocity (and without propulsion). in wikipedia it says you'll get infinitely far away, but you say it doesn't matter.
 
blackcat said:
can someone please help:

i know escape velocity is the velocity you need to give an object for it exit the pull of the Earth and travel an infinite distance away from earth.

now let's say you have a space shuttle that you need to take to Mars or the moon or something. why would you need to give it the escape velocity when you're only going a few million kilometres and not anywhere near an "infinite distance" away?

so how does that make sense?

It turns out that you use up most of the escape velocity while you are still very close to the Earth. For instance, While you don't need to achieve full escape velocity (11.2 km/sec) to reach the distance of the Moon, you do need 9.76 km/sec. If you then also want to match the Moon's orbital velocity it jumps up to 10.76 km/sec. In just getting to the Moon you have to almost achieve escape velocity. Going much past the Moon means having to get even closer to escape velocity. After a point, you are having to come so close to escape velocity that the difference doesn't matter.
 
The "infinite distance" comes from the reasoning that the potential energy at an infinity is zero. This becomes useful when you get into the math
 
ok thanks for your help guys.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K