Estimating the Bohr radius from the uncertainty principle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around estimating the Bohr radius using the uncertainty principle, with the initial approach involving the momentum equation p=h/r. The poster suggests substituting kinetic and potential energy to derive an energy function E=E(r) and then finding its minimum through differentiation. There is a consensus that the problem is straightforward and does not require excessive rigor, as it relies on approximations and assumptions. The poster seeks confirmation on whether their approach is correct or if any critical elements are overlooked. Overall, the method appears valid for estimating the Bohr radius.
drop_out_kid
Messages
34
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
In the below picture
Relevant Equations
Heisenberg uncertainty i guess
1649908091019.png


Soo. I think this problem is too direct and easy so I think I got it in wrong way: p=h/r and then plug in the K and V and then we get E=E(r) and get derivative and we have minimum? What do you think? is there sth I am missing?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems fine to me. It is not supposed to be a hard/rigorous problem after all, since you are doing approximation and some assumptions before starting the calculations.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'

Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'

Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
View full post »

Thread 'Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes'

TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
View full post »
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'

Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'

Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is（Figure 2）： F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
View full post »

Similar threads

How do I calculate Heisenburg's Uncertainty Principle?
Replies
16
Views
2K
Ground state wavelength and uncertainty Bohr/deBroglie model
Replies
1
Views
2K
Uncertainty in Wavelength Calculation from Wave Crests on a Pier
Replies
6
Views
2K
What is the Orbit of Hydrogen Atom for an Electron at 734 km/s?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Rejecting the Semiclassical Bohr Model: Examining the Uncertainty Relation
Replies
1
Views
2K
Quantum Theory of Earth Satellite Analogy to Bohr Model
Replies
5
Views
3K
Solving Bohr Atom Problem (Qs a-e)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Calculate the minimum uncertainty
Replies
5
Views
8K
Bohr-Sommerfeld model question "Old" Quantum Theory
Replies
8
Views
3K
Setting up an Uncertainty Problem
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top