Euler equations with Y(1) = 0, Y(2) = 0

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Euler equation in the context of boundary conditions Y(1) = 0 and Y(2) = 0. Participants explore the general form of the Euler equation and the implications of the specified boundary conditions on potential solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the general solutions for the Euler equation based on distinct, repeated, and complex roots. They question whether other solutions exist beyond the trivial solution Y=0 that satisfy the boundary conditions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of boundary value problems and the implications of the conditions imposed. Some participants suggest that the structure of the boundary conditions may limit the existence of non-trivial solutions, while others explore the effects of varying parameters A and B.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the requirement for boundary conditions involving both Y and its derivatives, which may influence the existence of solutions. Additionally, the discussion touches on the implications of A and B being non-real numbers in the context of the Euler equation.

gerald87
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Is it possible for an Euler equation to satisfy the boundary conditions Y(1)=0, Y(2)=0?

I have considered the three possibilities, distinct real roots, repeated roots and conjugate complex roots and cannot find any solutions.

Are there any other possibilities to consider?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you write the equation here?
 
Hi Eli,

Sorry, I should have been more clear in my question.

I am not talking about a specific Euler equation, but the general Euler equation,

X^2Y'' + AXY' +BY = 0.

I understand that there are three possible solutions for Y;
Y=c1x^m1 + c2x^m2 for distinct roots
Y=[c1 + c2ln(x)]x^m for repeated roots
or Y=[c1cos(bln(x))+c2sin(bln(x))]x^a for complex conjugate roots

When I put the boundary conditions Y(1) = 0, Y(2) = 0 into each of the possible solutions of Y, the only solution I can get is Y=0.

Are there any other possible solutions to an euler-cauchy problem than the three I mentioned above that should be considered?

Thanks
 
Hi,

I have a question relating to the Euler equation,

X^2Y'' + AXY' +BY = 0.

I understand that there are three possible solutions for Y;
Y=c1x^m1 + c2x^m2 for distinct roots
Y=[c1 + c2ln(x)]x^m for repeated roots
or Y=[c1cos(bln(x))+c2sin(bln(x))]x^a for complex conjugate roots

I am to determine whether or not there are solutions (real or imaginary), other than Y=0 to an euler Equation which satisfies the boundary conditions Y(1) = 0, Y(2) = 0.

When I put the boundary conditions Y(1) = 0, Y(2) = 0 into each of the possible solutions of Y, the only solution I can get is Y=0.

Are there any other possible solutions to an euler-cauchy problem than the three I mentioned above that should be considered?

I have noticed in every boundary value euler cauchy problem has the boundary conditions with Y and the derivative of Y, rather than Y in both. Could this mean there are no solutions?

I hope this makes sense, I am a little confused by this problem.

Thanks
 
Before you evaluate the boundary conditions, you have two linearly independent solutions in each case, which is all you can expect. If you show in each case that your conditions give only the trivial solution you are done.

What you have here is a boundary value problem (boundary conditions at two different points) as opposed to an initial value problem where the two conditions are at the same point. In a homogeneous boundary value problem like you have here, Y identically zero always works. And if you would have found a nontrivial solution satisfying the boundary conditions, then any constant times it would have also worked.
 
Thanks for the help.

What would happen if A and B in the initial equation were not real numbers?

Would it still be considered an euler equation? or would it have to be solved in a different way?

Thanks again.
 
Can't you get a non-trivial solution in the last case if b turned out to be a multiple of [itex]\pi/\log 2[/itex]? I'm assuming in this problem you have the freedom to adjust A and B to get the roots you want.
 
No. In order to have pure trig function (of ln(x)) solution, without a "x-B" term, you would have to have B= 0. But in that case, the characteristic equation is r2+ (A- 1)r= 0 which has roots r= 0 and r= 1- A, still not giving a periodic solution.
 
I didn't have a pure trig function solution in mind. I was thinking of something like [itex]y=c |x|^{\alpha} \sin(\pi \log |x|/\log 2)[/itex]. It would vanish at both x=1 and x=2.
 
  • #10
vela said:
I didn't have a pure trig function solution in mind. I was thinking of something like [itex]y=c |x|^{\alpha} \sin(\pi \log |x|/\log 2)[/itex]. It would vanish at both x=1 and x=2.
Ah, thanks.
 
  • #11
This same question was asked in "Differential Equations" so I merged the two threads.
gerald87, please do NOT post the same question repeatedly.
 
  • #12
thankyou so much for the help guys.

I think I have got it under control now.

And sorry about the double posts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K