Euler Lagrange equation of motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the equations of motion for the variables r and θ using the Euler-Lagrange equation. Participants analyze the Lagrangian, specifically the expression for the kinetic energy and potential energy, represented as ℒ = (1/2) m ((1 + K(r)) ẋ² + r² θ̇) - mgH(r), where K(r) = (∂H(r)/∂r)². The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying the chain rule for derivatives and emphasizes that the potential function H should not depend explicitly on time. Errors in derivative calculations were acknowledged, underscoring the need for careful analysis in deriving motion equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Euler-Lagrange equation in classical mechanics
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics and the concept of kinetic and potential energy
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and the chain rule in calculus
  • Basic understanding of functions and their derivatives, particularly in the context of physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equations in detail
  • Learn about the implications of the Lagrangian formulation in classical mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic energy, potential energy, and the Lagrangian
  • Investigate common mistakes in applying calculus to physics problems, particularly in mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, as well as educators and researchers interested in the application of the Euler-Lagrange equation to derive equations of motion.

bobred
Messages
170
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the equations of motion for both r and \theta of
5E%7B2%7D%20%5Cright%29%5Cdot%7Br%7D%5E%7B2%7D+r%5E%7B2%7D%5Cdot%7B%5Ctheta%7D%20%5Cright%29-mgH.png


Homework Equations


My problem is taking the derivative wrt time of

ex?%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20L%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20%5Cdot%7B%5Ctheta%7D%7D=mr%5E2%5Cdot%7B%5Ctheta%7D.png

and
\dfrac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\dot{r}}=m \dot{r} \left( 1 + \left( \dfrac{\partial H}{\partial r}\right)^2 \right)

The Attempt at a Solution


So
%7B%5Ctheta%7D%7D%20%5Cright%29=2mr%5Cdot%7Br%7D%5Cdot%7B%5Ctheta%7D+mr%5E2%5Cddot%7B%5Ctheta%7D.png

I think this is correct. I have the solution to the second expression but I am unsure how it was found
<br /> m \ddot{r} \left( 1 + \left( \dfrac{\partial H}{\partial r}\right)^2 \right) + 2 m \dot{r}^2 \dfrac{\partial H}{\partial r}\dfrac{\partial^2 H}{\partial r \partial t}<br />
The first part of this expression is fine it is the second part I am unsure of.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please specify what ##H## is a function of.
 
HI, sorry H(r).
 
So if H is only a function of r, the only possible derivative of H is the total derivative wrt r. Since r depends on t, the derivative wrt t is given by the chain rule. This also goes for dH/dr, which is also a function of r. The partial derivative of H wrt t does not make sense if H does not depend explicitly on t.
 
bobred said:
HI, sorry H(r).

So, if we write ##K(r) = (\partial H(r) /\partial r)^2## (which is just some computable function of ##r##) you have
{\cal{L}} = \frac{1}{2} m \left((1+ K(r)) \dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\theta} \right) - mgH(r)
Thus,
{\cal{L}}_r \equiv \partial {\cal{L}} /\partial r = \frac{1}{2}m \left( K&#039;(r) \dot{r}^2 + 2 r \dot{\theta} \right) - m g H&#039;(r)
so
\frac{d}{dt} {\cal{L}}_r = \frac{1}{2} m \left( K&#039;&#039;(r) \dot{r}^3 + K&#039;(r) 2 \dot{r} \ddot{r} + 2 \dot{\theta} \right) - mg H&#039;&#039;(r) \dot{r}

If ##H## does not depend explicitly on ##t## there should be no ##\partial H/\partial t## anywhere.
 
Ray Vickson said:
So, if we write ##K(r) = (\partial H(r) /\partial r)^2## (which is just some computable function of ##r##) you have
{\cal{L}} = \frac{1}{2} m \left((1+ K(r)) \dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\theta} \right) - mgH(r)
Thus,
{\cal{L}}_r \equiv \partial {\cal{L}} /\partial r = \frac{1}{2}m \left( K&#039;(r) \dot{r}^2 + 2 r \dot{\theta} \right) - m g H&#039;(r)
so
\frac{d}{dt} {\cal{L}}_r = \frac{1}{2} m \left( K&#039;&#039;(r) \dot{r}^3 + K&#039;(r) 2 \dot{r} \ddot{r} + 2 \dot{\theta} \right) - mg H&#039;&#039;(r) \dot{r}

This, although correct, is not relevant for the Euler-Lagrange equations which contain what you would call ##d\mathcal L_{\dot r}/dt##. Also, please allow the OP to try to do the derivatives for himself.
 
Orodruin said:
This, although correct, is not relevant for the Euler-Lagrange equations which contain what you would call ##d\mathcal L_{\dot r}/dt##. Also, please allow the OP to try to do the derivatives for himself.

You are right. Anyway, the OP did try to obtain the derivatives for himself, but made some errors. I admit maybe I should have not written so much detail (which does not matter anyway, since I did the wrong calculation!).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K