Euler's Method and Planetary Motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on using Newton's Laws and Euler's Method to model planetary motion. The user combines Newton's Second Law, F = m*a, with the Law of Universal Gravitation, F = -G*M1*M2/r^2, to derive the acceleration equation a = -G*m/r^2. The user attempts to convert the second-order differential equation into a system of first-order equations suitable for Euler's Method but encounters difficulties, particularly with the omission of centripetal acceleration in their calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Laws of Motion
  • Familiarity with the Law of Universal Gravitation
  • Knowledge of differential equations, specifically second-order and first-order equations
  • Experience with numerical methods, particularly Euler's Method
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of centripetal acceleration in orbital mechanics
  • Learn how to convert second-order differential equations into first-order systems
  • Explore numerical methods for solving differential equations beyond Euler's Method
  • Investigate the application of Runge-Kutta methods for improved accuracy in planetary motion simulations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics and mathematics, particularly those interested in celestial mechanics and numerical methods for solving differential equations.

antintheagora
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi there,

I wish to use Newton's Laws in conjunction with Euler's Method to model the motion of a planet around a star.

Homework Equations



2nd Law
F = m*a

Law of Universal Gravitation
F = -G*M1*M2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
First I combined the two laws above.

m*a = -G*M1*M2/r^2

Where M1 cancels out.

a = -G*m/r^2

Rewriting a as the second derivative of position gives:

d^2r/dt^2 = -G*m/r^2

Euler's method is incompatible with a second order differential equation, so I tried to write it as a system of coupled first order differential equations.

dr/dt = v

and

dv/dt = -G*m/r^2I guess this is where I'm a little stuck. Does everything appear correct so far? I tried Euler's method on these two but I think my results were incorrect. Any help would be greatly appreciated. :oldcool:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
antintheagora said:
d^2r/dt^2 = -G*m/r^2
you've omitted centripetal acceleration.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K