Evaluating a Surface Integral for S: How Can the Given Formula be Used?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating a surface integral using a specific formula related to vector fields and surface integrals. The surface in question is defined by the equation \(y = x^2\) within certain bounds for \(x\) and \(z\), and the vector field is given as \(\vec{v} = (3z^2, 6, 6xz)\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to identify the scalar function \(f\) that describes the surface \(S\) and question how to derive it from the given information. There are attempts to clarify the inequalities for the bounds of \(x\) and \(z\). Some participants suggest parameterizing the surface and using a specific formula for the integral.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and attempting to clarify the setup. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet, but some guidance on parameterization and the importance of orientation has been provided.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the inequalities for the bounds of \(x\) and \(z\), indicating that the original poster may have misstated them. The need for clarity on the scalar function \(f\) is also emphasized, as it is crucial for evaluating the integral.

wifi
Messages
115
Reaction score
1
Problem:

Use the fact that \int_S \vec{v} \cdot d\vec{S}=\int_S \vec{v} \cdot \frac{\nabla f}{\partial f/\partial x} dy\ dz

to evaluate the integral for ##S=\{(x,y,z):y=x^2 ; 0 \geq x \geq 2; 0 \geq z \geq 3 \}## and ##\vec{v}=(3z^2, 6, 6xz)##.

Attempt at a Solution:

I'm having trouble setting up this integral. If I knew what ##f## was, I could easily calculate the gradient, as well as the partial wrt to x. I'd still need to figure out the limits of integration though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f(x,y,z) ought to be the scalar function describing the surface S through the relationship:
f(x,y,z)=0
 
arildno said:
f(x,y,z) ought to be the scalar function describing the surface S through the relationship:
f(x,y,z)=0

Hmm. I'm not sure you'd get this from the info given. Any hints?
 
Because
1. It fits. Sort of (I admit I haven't seen closely, though).
2. Otherwise, it would be utterly meaningless, since you would have no way to evaluate the second expression due to lack of knowledge of f.
 
More specifically I meant, how would you find ##f## analytically from this info given?
 
wifi said:
More specifically I meant, how would you find ##f## analytically from this info given?

From here:

wifi said:
##S=\{(x,y,z):y=x^2 ; 0 \geq x \geq 2; 0 \geq z \geq 3 \}##

If y = x^2 then y - x^2 = 0.

(Your inequalities are the wrong way round: you want 0 \leq x \leq 2 etc.)
 
pasmith said:
From here:



If y = x^2 then y - x^2 = 0.

(Your inequalities are the wrong way round: you want 0 \leq x \leq 2 etc.)

So ##f(x,y,z)=y-x^2##?
 
I would parameterize the surface as ##\vec R(x,z)## and use the formula$$
\iint \vec v\cdot d\vec S =\pm \iint_{x,z}\vec v \cdot \vec R_x\times \vec R_z~dxdz$$where the choice of signs depends on the orientation of the surface which, by the way, you need to specify.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K