Evaluating a Surface Integral for S: How Can the Given Formula be Used?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the surface integral using the formula \(\int_S \vec{v} \cdot d\vec{S}=\int_S \vec{v} \cdot \frac{\nabla f}{\partial f/\partial x} dy\ dz\) for the surface defined by \(S=\{(x,y,z):y=x^2 ; 0 \leq x \leq 2; 0 \leq z \leq 3 \}\) and the vector field \(\vec{v}=(3z^2, 6, 6xz)\). Participants emphasize the need to identify the scalar function \(f(x,y,z)=y-x^2\) to compute the gradient and set up the integral correctly. The discussion also highlights the importance of parameterizing the surface as \(\vec R(x,z)\) and determining the orientation for accurate evaluation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of surface integrals in vector calculus
  • Familiarity with gradient and divergence operations
  • Knowledge of parameterization techniques for surfaces
  • Proficiency in evaluating double integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of parameterizing surfaces in three-dimensional space
  • Learn about calculating gradients and their applications in surface integrals
  • Explore the concept of surface orientation and its impact on integral evaluation
  • Practice evaluating surface integrals with different vector fields and surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and engineers engaged in vector calculus, particularly those working with surface integrals and vector fields.

wifi
Messages
115
Reaction score
1
Problem:

Use the fact that \int_S \vec{v} \cdot d\vec{S}=\int_S \vec{v} \cdot \frac{\nabla f}{\partial f/\partial x} dy\ dz

to evaluate the integral for ##S=\{(x,y,z):y=x^2 ; 0 \geq x \geq 2; 0 \geq z \geq 3 \}## and ##\vec{v}=(3z^2, 6, 6xz)##.

Attempt at a Solution:

I'm having trouble setting up this integral. If I knew what ##f## was, I could easily calculate the gradient, as well as the partial wrt to x. I'd still need to figure out the limits of integration though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f(x,y,z) ought to be the scalar function describing the surface S through the relationship:
f(x,y,z)=0
 
arildno said:
f(x,y,z) ought to be the scalar function describing the surface S through the relationship:
f(x,y,z)=0

Hmm. I'm not sure you'd get this from the info given. Any hints?
 
Because
1. It fits. Sort of (I admit I haven't seen closely, though).
2. Otherwise, it would be utterly meaningless, since you would have no way to evaluate the second expression due to lack of knowledge of f.
 
More specifically I meant, how would you find ##f## analytically from this info given?
 
wifi said:
More specifically I meant, how would you find ##f## analytically from this info given?

From here:

wifi said:
##S=\{(x,y,z):y=x^2 ; 0 \geq x \geq 2; 0 \geq z \geq 3 \}##

If y = x^2 then y - x^2 = 0.

(Your inequalities are the wrong way round: you want 0 \leq x \leq 2 etc.)
 
pasmith said:
From here:



If y = x^2 then y - x^2 = 0.

(Your inequalities are the wrong way round: you want 0 \leq x \leq 2 etc.)

So ##f(x,y,z)=y-x^2##?
 
I would parameterize the surface as ##\vec R(x,z)## and use the formula$$
\iint \vec v\cdot d\vec S =\pm \iint_{x,z}\vec v \cdot \vec R_x\times \vec R_z~dxdz$$where the choice of signs depends on the orientation of the surface which, by the way, you need to specify.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K