Evaluating ∫cF⋅dr Using Stokes' Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter happykamper21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stokes Theorem
Click For Summary
Stokes' Theorem relates the line integral of a vector field around a closed curve to the surface integral of its curl over the surface bounded by the curve. In this case, the vector field F is given, and the curve C is defined by the intersection of a plane and a cylinder. The discussion highlights confusion about which form of Stokes' Theorem to apply, noting that both the line integral and surface integral approaches yield the same result. However, the context of the problem suggests that using the surface integral is more appropriate to demonstrate the application of the theorem. Ultimately, the choice of method may depend on the specific details provided in the problem.
happykamper21
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use Stokes' Theorem to evaluate ∫cF ⋅ dr, where F(x, y, z) = x2zi + xy2j + z2k and C is the curve of the intersection of the plane x + y + z = 1 and the cylinder x2 + y2 = 9 oriented counterclockwise as viewed from above.

Homework Equations


Stoke's Theorem:
cF ⋅ dr = ∫s curlF ⋅ ds

The Attempt at a Solution


For this problem I am extremely confused of which variant of Stoke's theorem to use and when it is appropriate to use a certain variant. For this problem my teacher found the curlF and then dotted it with the ds. However there are problems in the same section where he uses the left side of Stoke's Theorem. Is it possible to use both? If so, would it be possible to say which would be more advantageous over the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since both sides give identical answers, it is concievable to use either one or both. But often one is much easier than the other. You can probably get a feel for which is easier by looking at the examples and the one that your teacher did not use to see what the problems would be. In example problems, you are often given the information needed for one side and not for the other, so it is simple.
 
Since you are being told to use the theorem to compute the circulation integral, you should use it to go from a circulation integral to a surface integral. If you just computed the circulation integral you would not be using the theorem...
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K