MHB Evaluating $\displaystyle \lim_{{x}\to{2}} f(x$): Does it Exist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joel Jacon
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The limit as x approaches 2 for the piecewise function f(x) = x - |x| for x < 2, 4 for x = 2, and 3x - 5 for x > 2 is evaluated. The left-hand limit (LHL) is calculated as 0, while the right-hand limit (RHL) is found to be 1. Since the LHL and RHL do not match, the overall limit as x approaches 2 does not exist. The discussion clarifies the use of absolute value in the context of evaluating limits and reinforces the understanding of piecewise functions. The participants engage in exploring the implications of modulus and absolute value in limit calculations.
Joel Jacon
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Evaluate $\displaystyle \lim_{{x}\to{2}} f(x$) if it exist where $f(x)$ = x - |x| where x<2;4 where x = 2;3x - 5 where x>2?

LHL

$\displaystyle \lim_{{x}\to{2}} f(2x)$ = 4

RHL

$\displaystyle \lim_{{x}\to{2}} f(3x - 5)$ = 1

Therefore the limit x tend to 2 for the function does not exist.

Have I done correctly? If not tell me what mistake I made?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If I'm understanding correctly this is a piecewise function, correct? Like this?

$$f(x)=\begin{cases}x-|x|, & x<2 \\[3pt] 4, & x=2 \\[3pt] 3x-5, & x>2 \\ \end{cases}$$

If so, then for the LHL we should look at what function applies when $x<2$. Which one is that? Once you pick that function what value do you get for 1.9, 1.99, 1.999, etc.?
 
Jameson said:
If I'm understanding correctly this is a piecewise function, correct? Like this?

$$f(x)=\begin{cases}x-|x|, & x<2 \\[3pt] 4, & x=2 \\[3pt] 3x-5, & x>2 \\ \end{cases}$$

If so, then for the LHL we should look at what function applies when $x<2$. Which one is that? Once you pick that function what value do you get for 1.9, 1.99, 1.999, etc.?

Can you please tell me how to deal with the modulus. i know that x - |x| is the function to be used for LHL as x<2
 
pcforgeek said:
Can you please tell me how to deal with the modulus. i know that x - |x| is the function to be used for LHL as x<2

I'm not familiar with the term modulus for these brackets, but that might another term for it. I'm interpreting it as absolute value, meaning its distance from 0. You are correct that our $f(x)$ is $x-|x|$. Try plugging in numbers as I suggested. Did you try that?

$(1.9-|1.9|)=(1.9-1.9)=0$

What about 1.99? 1.999?

EDIT: It seems modulus and absolute value are synonymous in this situation. Learn something new every day.
 
Jameson said:
I'm not familiar with the term modulus for these brackets, but that might another term for it. I'm interpreting it as absolute value, meaning its distance from 0. You are correct that our $f(x)$ is $x-|x|$. Try plugging in numbers as I suggested. Did you try that?

$(1.9-|1.9|)=(1.9-1.9)=0$

What about 1.99? 1.999?

EDIT: It seems modulus and absolute value are synonymous in this situation. Learn something new every day.

If modulus is the absolute value then can you explain me why we use $\lim_{{x}\to{0}} \frac{x}{|x|}$ as $\lim_{{x}\to{0}} \frac{x}{-x}$ for LHL
and $\lim_{{x}\to{0}} \frac{x}{x}$ for RHL for the question in which we have to show $\lim_{{x}\to{0}} \frac{x}{|x|}$ does not exist
 
pcforgeek said:
If modulus is the absolute value then can you explain me why we use $\lim_{{x}\to{0}} \frac{x}{|x|}$ as $\lim_{{x}\to{0}} \frac{x}{-x}$ for LHL
and $\lim_{{x}\to{0}} \frac{x}{x}$ for RHL for the question in which we have to show $\lim_{{x}\to{0}} \frac{x}{|x|}$ does not exist

Sure. When we are dealing with positive numbers, or $x>0$, then $|x|=x$. For example |5|=5. When we are dealing with negative numbers, or $x<0$ then |x|=-x. For example |-4|= -(-4)=4.

When are looking at a limit at $x=0$ on the left hand side we have negative numbers and on the right hand side we have positive numbers so when taking the left hand limit we consider negative values of $x$ and when taking the right hand limit we consider positive values of $x$.

Going back to the problem in this thread, what do you get for:

$$\lim_{{x}\to{2^-}}\hspace{1 mm} f(x)$$?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads

Back
Top