Evaluating Line Integral F over C: a Step-by-Step Guide

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on evaluating the line integral of the vector field F = (3x + 2y)i + (2x - y)j along the line segment C from (0,0) to (1,1). The correct parameterization is established as x(t) = t and y(t) = t for t in the interval [0, 1]. The integral to evaluate is confirmed as ∫₀¹ [(3t + 2t) + (2t - t)] dt, simplifying to ∫₀¹ (4t) dt. Additionally, the discussion explores parameterization for a curve defined by y = x², leading to the integral ∫₀¹ [(3t² + 2t²)2t + (2t² - t²)2t] dt.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and line integrals
  • Familiarity with parameterization of curves in calculus
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in calculus
  • Ability to differentiate functions and apply the chain rule
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of parameterizing curves in different forms, such as y = x²
  • Learn about the application of the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals
  • Explore advanced integration techniques, including integration by parts
  • Investigate the implications of vector field properties on line integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on vector calculus and line integrals, as well as educators seeking to clarify these concepts for their students.

boneill3
Messages
126
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let F=(3x+2y)i+(2x-y)j Evaluate \int_{C}F . dr where C is the line segment from (0,0) to (1,1)

Homework Equations



\int_{a}^{b}[f(x(t),y(t))x'(t) + g(x(t),y(t))y'(t)]dt

The Attempt at a Solution



How do I choose the correct values of x and y as a function of t?
And do I just integrate over a = 0 to b = 1 ?

regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What parametrization have you found for x(t) and y(t)?
 
i.e. what is a parameterization for the line from (0,0) to (1,1)?
 
I'm using the formula to find
<br /> r(t) = (1-t)(x_{0},y_{0})+t(x_{1},y_{1})<br /> =(1-t)(0,0)+t(1,1)\\<br /> <br /> \text{ so } x = t y = t for 0<t<1
 
So is the integral to evaluate

<br /> <br /> \int_{0}^{1} [(3t+2t)3+(2t-t)]dt<br /> <br />

regards
 
boneill3 said:
I'm using the formula to find
<br /> r(t) = (1-t)(x_{0},y_{0})+t(x_{1},y_{1})<br /> =(1-t)(0,0)+t(1,1)\\<br /> <br /> \text{ so } x = t y = t for 0<t<1
So x= t, y= t. Yes, that goes from (0,0) to (1,1)

boneill3 said:
So is the integral to evaluate

<br /> <br /> \int_{0}^{1} [(3t+2t)3+(2t-t)]dt<br /> <br />

regards
where did you get the "3" multiplying (3t+ 2t)?
 
Let F=(3x+2y)i+(2x-y)j

\int_{a}^{b}[f(x(t),y(t))x&#039;(t) + g(x(t),y(t))y&#039;(t)]dt


I got the three from the partial derivative dx of 3x+2y = 3

But I think I may have stuffed up because the formula
says x'(t) which would be 1.

So the integral would be

\int_{0}^{1} [(3t+2t)+(2t-t)]dt


Is that better?
 
boneill3 said:
So is the integral to evaluate

<br /> <br /> \int_{0}^{1} [(3t+2t)3+(2t-t)]dt<br /> <br />

regards


yes your limits would be from 0 to 1
 
Hi Guys

If C instead of a line segment is y= x^2 can I substitute x = t so that C is now just
[latex}
fy(t)= t^2
[/itex]

regards
 
  • #10
Sorry,

<br /> fy(t)= t^2<br />
 
  • #11
I've used the new parameterization of x = t^2 y = t^2 ( for C y=x^2)

On the original function

So is the integral to evaluate now

\int_{0}^{1} [(3t+2t)2t+(2t-t)2t]dt

Where x'(t) = x'(t^2) = 2t

and

Where y'(t) = y'(t^2) = 2t

Is this right so far?

regards
Brendan
 
  • #12
You need to put x=t^2 and y=t^2 into the definition of the vector F as well, right? Or if you are doing y=x^2, x=t, y=t^2, dx=dt, dy=2tdt. You seem to be mixing up your parametrizations.
 
  • #13
So I need to put it as
\int_{0}^{1} [(3t^2+2t^2)2t+(2t^2-t^2)2t]dt

regards
 
  • #14
Yes, that's right for parametrizing along the line between (0,0) and (1,1) using x=t^2 and y=t^2. And you should get the same answer as using x=t and y=t.
 
  • #15
Thanks for all your help guys
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K