Evaluation of fugacity (Chemical Engineering)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the evaluation of fugacity in chemical engineering, specifically addressing a potential error in an equation that may lead to evaluating ln(0), which is undefined. Participants reference Chapter 11 of "Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics" by Smith, Van Ness, and Abbott, where the relevant equations and concepts are discussed. The Lee-Kesler correlations are highlighted as essential for determining the compressibility factor, Z, using double interpolation methods. This indicates the importance of accurate data interpretation in thermodynamic calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fugacity and its significance in chemical engineering
  • Familiarity with the Lee-Kesler correlations for compressibility factor calculations
  • Knowledge of double interpolation techniques in data analysis
  • Access to "Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics" by Smith, Van Ness, and Abbott
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Lee-Kesler correlations in detail for accurate fugacity calculations
  • Learn about double interpolation methods for data extraction and analysis
  • Review Chapter 11 of "Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics" for foundational concepts
  • Explore additional resources on fugacity and its applications in real-world chemical processes
USEFUL FOR

Chemical engineering students, educators, and professionals involved in thermodynamics and phase equilibrium analysis will benefit from this discussion.

galaxy_twirl
Messages
137
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I was revising the topic on the evaluation of fugacity of liquids and gases for my chemical engineering course, when I ran into an equation which I think, may be wrong as I think it may evaluate to ln0, which is infinity.

Here is a snapshot of the equation:

vo23w7.jpg


The equation in question is the integral just above the words "GRAPHICAL INTEGRATION".

May I know if the equation is erroneous?

Thanks!

Homework Equations



NIL

The Attempt at a Solution


NIL
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you looked through your textbook? It would be in Chapter 11 of Smith, Van Ness, and Abbott if I am not mistaken
 
Maylis said:
Have you looked through your textbook? It would be in Chapter 11 of Smith, Van Ness, and Abbott if I am not mistaken

Hi Maylis. I think my friend got his answer already~ :) He said something about using the table, and that the Z thingy is a function of Pr. Haha. Is he correct? I don't have the textbook, perhaps I can ask him to borrow it at the library. :)
 
He may be speaking about the Lee-Kesler correlations, which are found in tables in the same textbook mentioned. Those tables require the use of double interpolation, so be methodical when using them to find the compressibility factor, Z.
 
Maylis said:
He may be speaking about the Lee-Kesler correlations, which are found in tables in the same textbook mentioned. Those tables require the use of double interpolation, so be methodical when using them to find the compressibility factor, Z.

I see. Yupp, my friend said he has understood the concept. :) Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
17K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K