Evanescent and Gradient force on an optical waveguide

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of the evanescent field in an optical waveguide, specifically when immersed in toluene with a refractive index of 1.5. The core's refractive index is 1.45, and the cladding's is 1.4. Participants concluded that the evanescent field would not be present in the toluene due to its higher refractive index, leading to propagation rather than evanescence. They suggested measuring transmission loss to assess light leakage and recommended simplifying the geometry for calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of evanescent fields and total internal reflection
  • Knowledge of refractive indices and their impact on light propagation
  • Familiarity with optical waveguide theory
  • Experience with measuring transmission loss in optical fibers
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Evanescent field behavior in optical waveguides"
  • Study "Transmission loss measurement techniques for optical fibers"
  • Explore "Planar waveguide calculations for optical applications"
  • Investigate "High index optical fibers and their applications"
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and engineers in optics, particularly those focused on optical waveguides, evanescent fields, and optical trapping techniques.

Sciencestd
Messages
60
Reaction score
9
Präsentation1.jpg

Let's say that on the surface of the cladding we have evanescent field due to the total internal reflection between the core and the cladding. The refractive indices of the the core is 1.45 and the refractive index of the cladding is 1.4, and I want to use the gradient force of the evanescent field (Evanescent field exponentially decaying above the surface), so I casted particles that immersed in toluene which has refractive index of 1.5, do you think it will still evanescent field and not frustrated evanescent field because the refractive index of toluene is higher?!
Please answer me it is crucial.
 
Science news on Phys.org
How thick is the cladding? Much will depend on how far down the evanescent wave has decayed at the outer cladding surface.

[edit] Actually, one could measure this by immersing the fiber in the medium and measuring the change in transmission loss.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sciencestd
Another point, once into the 1.5 index the field will likely be non evanescent. I would suggest simplifying the problem by considering a plan geometry rather than a cylindrical one. Much easier to solve and it would give a feel for the answer.

The measurement of transmission loss I'm assuming a non evanescent field in the toluene.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sciencestd
Paul Colby said:
How thick is the cladding? Much will depend on how far down the evanescent wave has decayed at the outer cladding surface.

[edit] Actually, one could measure this by immersing the fiber in the medium and measuring the change in transmission loss.

Let's say the cladding is so thin and the evanescent field is bit large comparing to the cladding, that a portion of evanescent field will reach the droplet...,
can you please explain the point about transmission loss...
 
Sciencestd said:
Let's say the cladding is so thin and the evanescent field is bit large comparing to the cladding, that a portion of evanescent field will reach the droplet...,
There is a lab experiment people do in school where the hypotenuses of two 45 degree prisms are brought within very close proximity. A laser beam reflecting off one will tunnel to the second based on how far the evanescent wave has decayed outside the reflection surface. Basically the beam is no longer evanescent after it jumps the boundary.

Sciencestd said:
can you please explain the point about transmission loss...
Sure. One can check if a given fiber leaks light into toluene by measuring the light lost when a section of the fiber is immersed. For any given fiber my bet is near no light at all will leak cause it wouldn't be a very good fiber design if it did.

I get the feeling your interest hinges on the field being evanescent in the toluene. I don't see why it would be. To make certain I would do a planar waveguide calculation as a sanity check first. If you're contemplating single mode fiber a full cylindrical geometry wouldn't be too difficult.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sciencestd
Sciencestd said:
Let's say that on the surface of the cladding we have evanescent field due to the total internal reflection between the core and the cladding. The refractive indices of the the core is 1.45 and the refractive index of the cladding is 1.4, and I want to use the gradient force of the evanescent field (Evanescent field exponentially decaying above the surface), so I casted particles that immersed in toluene which has refractive index of 1.5, do you think it will still evanescent field and not frustrated evanescent field because the refractive index of toluene is higher?!
Please answer me it is crucial.

In the n=1.5 region, any EM field that leaks through the cladding will be propagating, not evanescent. Are you trying some sort of optical trapping?
 
Andy Resnick said:
In the n=1.5 region, any EM field that leaks through the cladding will be propagating, not evanescent. Are you trying some sort of optical trapping?
Yes exactly to trap particles... So they will not feel gradient force...?!
by the way how would the mode field get changed in this case?!
 
Thank you so much Paul Colby for your answers, it really gave me direction in thinking..
I'm just now looking how would the mode field changed in region where I cast Toluene..
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Paul Colby
  • #11
Paul Colby said:
There are high index fiber, 1.6 or greater that might be of interest?

http://przyrbwn.icm.edu.pl/APP/PDF/114/a114zA11.pdf
The point that I have to use a waveguide made in special way with specefic refractive indices as mentioned above. I casted a droplet of toluene contains molecules..., then I got aggregation above the waveguide... I thought it is because gradient force caused by evanescent field... but unfortunately it seems not because the toluene has higher refractive index... now I have to explain why I got aggregation up the waveguide...!
(and next step to use solution with lower refractive index)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Paul Colby
  • #12
I can only guess what you're talking about. If there is data, we need to know about it to comment. Other than that, who can help?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sciencestd
  • #13
Sciencestd said:
Yes exactly to trap particles... So they will not feel gradient force...?!
by the way how would the mode field get changed in this case?!

That's unclear to me- I am aware of some similar approaches for 'nano-tweezers' but don't know too many details:

https://www.osapublishing.org/josab/abstract.cfm?uri=josab-12-12-2429
https://www.osapublishing.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-22-13-16322
https://www.osapublishing.org/ol/abstract.cfm?uri=ol-21-21-1768
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022407312002877
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sciencestd
  • #14
Paul Colby said:
I can only guess what you're talking about. If there is data, we need to know about it to comment. Other than that, who can help?
The particles has close absorption resonance at the light coupled in the waveguide... and if we say that a gaussian beam propagates in the fiber so anyway there is a gradient force in and out the plane (because the gaussian beam is decaying... So the question is does these two thing causes to molecules to aggregate on the waveguide!
 
  • #15
Andy Resnick said:
Thank you so much man.. the articles are so useful..one of the articles I think it's so close to my case! we''ll see..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K