Why are certain transformations in the case of D4 group considered even or odd?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LagrangeEuler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even Transformation
Click For Summary
In the discussion about the D4 group, the transformations ##\rho, \rho^2, \rho^3, \rho^4## are identified as even transformations, while ##\rho\sigma, \rho^2\sigma, \rho^3\sigma## are classified as odd transformations. The distinction hinges on the definitions of even and odd transformations, which are essential for understanding their properties. Participants emphasize the importance of having a clear mathematical definition to accurately categorize these transformations. Without this foundational knowledge, explanations regarding their classification may not be comprehensible. Understanding these definitions is crucial for proving the nature of specific transformations within the D4 group.
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Why ##\rho,\rho^2,\rho^3,\rho^4## are even transformation and ##\rho\sigma,\rho^2\sigma,\rho^3\sigma## are odd transformation. I'm talking about case of ##D_4## group, where ##\rho## is rotation and ##\sigma## is reflection.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi LagrangeEuler! :smile:

What is the definition of even (or odd) transformation? :wink:
 
Not sure.
 
LagrangeEuler said:
Not sure.

ok, if you can't give a "mathy" definition, just give an ordinary english explanation (or example), and we'll take it from there :smile:

(go back to your notes or your book, if necessary)
 
tiny-tim's point is, I expect, that you cannot expect to understand any explanation we give as to why a specific transformation is, or is not, even or odd if you do not know what the definition of "even" or "odd" transformation is. And in mathematics definition are "working" definitions- we use the precise words of definitions is proving things. So we would expect to use the precise words of the definitions of "even" and "odd" transformations in proving that certain transformations are even or odd.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
5K