Evenly distributed points on a sphere

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on generating evenly distributed points on a sphere for practical applications, highlighting the limitations of using Platonic polyhedrons, which can only provide a finite number of evenly spaced points. A numeric technique involving repulsion between points is mentioned as a valid method for achieving a more uniform distribution, but determining the optimal number of points (N) for even spacing remains a challenge. The conversation references two algorithms for generating equidistributed points on a sphere, suggesting that the choice of algorithm can significantly impact the results. The importance of understanding the distribution method and its implications is emphasized. Overall, the thread provides insights into the complexities of achieving uniform point distribution on spherical surfaces.
Mike_In_Plano
Messages
700
Reaction score
35
I have a practical application which relies upon the generation of evenly distributed points on a sphere.

When I first considered this problem, I learned that some number of polyhedrons (Platonic polyhedrons) had each vertex lying evenly spaced from the others within the surface of a sphere. I also found that there was a finite number of these shapes and I needed far more points on my sphere (10's of thousands)

Next I learned that there was an accepted methodology to distribute points in a roughly even fashion through a numeric technique whereby each point is treated as having a repulsion to his neighbors and the system of points is adjusted until the net repulsion reaches a minimum.

This latter technique seems valid enough given that one knows the critical number of points to introduce to ensure that the distribution is even (i.e. the distances between points is consistent over all cases.) However, how does one go about finding N, such that all points may be evenly spaced?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If all points should have the same distances to other points, you are limited to archimedean solids and platonic solids. They allow up to 120 points, but the distribution is not really uniform.

This thread might be interesting.
 
Thank you so much, MFB, and Jim. I especially like the link to the paper. Short and sweet :)

- Mike
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K